let me preface my original statement with the following legalese weasel
clause: "at some point in the past, i was let to believe that..."



On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:26 AM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@labs.coraid.com>wrote:

> On Mon Dec  2 14:17:04 EST 2013, skip.tavakkolian@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > I believe one or two 9fans have provided systems for this purpose.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:33 AM, erik quanstrom <
> quanstro@labs.coraid.com>wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > all this is moot unless we can get plan 9 integrated into go's
> automatic
> > > build system.  is this doable?  i have resources to make this happen if
> > > it is.
>
> if so, something's gone very wrong.  usually the purpose of automatic
> build machines it to insure that things build and hopefully pass a few
> basic
> tests before the code can be checked in.  i'd assumed that this was not
> working
> since clearly the plan 9 386 port is broken on a regular basis.
>
> if this can't be sorted out, then tracking mainline go is going to be quite
> hard, maybe even impractical.  it's so much harder to get things fixed
> after
> code is merged than before.
>
> - erik
>