[9fans] 9Cloud Source

[9fans] 9Cloud Source

[Shane Morris]

Hi guys,

Was wondering if the source of 9Cloud was available for perusal? Just
logged in, looks great!

Many thanks!

Shane.

Re: [9fans] 9Cloud Source

[Skip Tavakkolian]

assuming you mean 9PCloud (otherwise ignore this):

i plan to put the 9P javascript sources on github or bitbucket.  you
can view the sources using the debugger in chrome.  they're all
dual-licensed (MIT and GPLv2).  i also plan to make a simple version
of the namespace "janitor" (brucee coined the term) that uses factotum
handle auth.  it will be in the same source repo.

the backend uses a custom Plan 9 cpu that includes the "export"
(exportfs) system call.  the patch for export was submitted to all
fronts, popular or otherwise (Labs, 9p.io, 9atom, 9front).

> Hi guys,
>
> Was wondering if the source of 9Cloud was available for perusal? Just
> logged in, looks great!
>
> Many thanks!
>
> Shane.

Re: [9fans] 9Cloud Source

[Shane Morris]

Hi Skip,

Yeah, I meant 9PCloud, sorry about that! I just logged in the other
day, I like what I see.

Many thanks!

Shane.

On 7/16/15, Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com> wrote:
> assuming you mean 9PCloud (otherwise ignore this):
>
> i plan to put the 9P javascript sources on github or bitbucket.  you
> can view the sources using the debugger in chrome.  they're all
> dual-licensed (MIT and GPLv2).  i also plan to make a simple version
> of the namespace "janitor" (brucee coined the term) that uses factotum
> handle auth.  it will be in the same source repo.
>
> the backend uses a custom Plan 9 cpu that includes the "export"
> (exportfs) system call.  the patch for export was submitted to all
> fronts, popular or otherwise (Labs, 9p.io, 9atom, 9front).
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Was wondering if the source of 9Cloud was available for perusal? Just
>> logged in, looks great!
>>
>> Many thanks!
>>
>> Shane.
>
>
>

Re: [9fans] 9Cloud Source

[Skip Tavakkolian]

> I just logged in the other
> day, I like what I see.

Thanks Shane.

to anyone who has tried it, i appreciate getting any sort of feedback,
bug reports, and suggestions.  you can email me directly.

-Skip

Re: [9fans] 9Cloud Source

[hiro]

Hello Skip, is there a way I could receive the patch for export?

On 7/15/15, Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com> wrote:
> assuming you mean 9PCloud (otherwise ignore this):
>
> i plan to put the 9P javascript sources on github or bitbucket.  you
> can view the sources using the debugger in chrome.  they're all
> dual-licensed (MIT and GPLv2).  i also plan to make a simple version
> of the namespace "janitor" (brucee coined the term) that uses factotum
> handle auth.  it will be in the same source repo.
>
> the backend uses a custom Plan 9 cpu that includes the "export"
> (exportfs) system call.  the patch for export was submitted to all
> fronts, popular or otherwise (Labs, 9p.io, 9atom, 9front).
>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> Was wondering if the source of 9Cloud was available for perusal? Just
>> logged in, looks great!
>>
>> Many thanks!
>>
>> Shane.
>
>
>

Re: [9fans] 9Cloud Source

[Skip Tavakkolian]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1096 bytes --]

i submitted the patch to 9p.io some time ago; it was under
"syscall-exprotfs".


On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:16 PM hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Skip, is there a way I could receive the patch for export?
>
> On 7/15/15, Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com> wrote:
> > assuming you mean 9PCloud (otherwise ignore this):
> >
> > i plan to put the 9P javascript sources on github or bitbucket.  you
> > can view the sources using the debugger in chrome.  they're all
> > dual-licensed (MIT and GPLv2).  i also plan to make a simple version
> > of the namespace "janitor" (brucee coined the term) that uses factotum
> > handle auth.  it will be in the same source repo.
> >
> > the backend uses a custom Plan 9 cpu that includes the "export"
> > (exportfs) system call.  the patch for export was submitted to all
> > fronts, popular or otherwise (Labs, 9p.io, 9atom, 9front).
> >
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> Was wondering if the source of 9Cloud was available for perusal? Just
> >> logged in, looks great!
> >>
> >> Many thanks!
> >>
> >> Shane.
> >
> >
> >
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1674 bytes --]

Re: [9fans] 9Cloud Source

[Skip Tavakkolian]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1253 bytes --]

i mean "syscall-exportfs"


On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:10 PM Skip Tavakkolian <skip.tavakkolian@gmail.com>
wrote:

> i submitted the patch to 9p.io some time ago; it was under
> "syscall-exprotfs".
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:16 PM hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Skip, is there a way I could receive the patch for export?
>>
>> On 7/15/15, Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com> wrote:
>> > assuming you mean 9PCloud (otherwise ignore this):
>> >
>> > i plan to put the 9P javascript sources on github or bitbucket.  you
>> > can view the sources using the debugger in chrome.  they're all
>> > dual-licensed (MIT and GPLv2).  i also plan to make a simple version
>> > of the namespace "janitor" (brucee coined the term) that uses factotum
>> > handle auth.  it will be in the same source repo.
>> >
>> > the backend uses a custom Plan 9 cpu that includes the "export"
>> > (exportfs) system call.  the patch for export was submitted to all
>> > fronts, popular or otherwise (Labs, 9p.io, 9atom, 9front).
>> >
>> >> Hi guys,
>> >>
>> >> Was wondering if the source of 9Cloud was available for perusal? Just
>> >> logged in, looks great!
>> >>
>> >> Many thanks!
>> >>
>> >> Shane.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2090 bytes --]

Re: [9fans] 9Cloud Source

[Skip Tavakkolian]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1653 bytes --]

I couldn't find it on 9p.io, so I'm not sure what happened. I recall that I
screwed up the first two attempts and had to ask David to clean them up for
me.

Anyhow, I submitted the patch to Labs' sources a few minutes ago:
/n/sources/patch/syscall-exportfs


On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:18 PM Skip Tavakkolian <skip.tavakkolian@gmail.com>
wrote:

> i mean "syscall-exportfs"
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:10 PM Skip Tavakkolian <
> skip.tavakkolian@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> i submitted the patch to 9p.io some time ago; it was under
>> "syscall-exprotfs".
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:16 PM hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Skip, is there a way I could receive the patch for export?
>>>
>>> On 7/15/15, Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com> wrote:
>>> > assuming you mean 9PCloud (otherwise ignore this):
>>> >
>>> > i plan to put the 9P javascript sources on github or bitbucket.  you
>>> > can view the sources using the debugger in chrome.  they're all
>>> > dual-licensed (MIT and GPLv2).  i also plan to make a simple version
>>> > of the namespace "janitor" (brucee coined the term) that uses factotum
>>> > handle auth.  it will be in the same source repo.
>>> >
>>> > the backend uses a custom Plan 9 cpu that includes the "export"
>>> > (exportfs) system call.  the patch for export was submitted to all
>>> > fronts, popular or otherwise (Labs, 9p.io, 9atom, 9front).
>>> >
>>> >> Hi guys,
>>> >>
>>> >> Was wondering if the source of 9Cloud was available for perusal? Just
>>> >> logged in, looks great!
>>> >>
>>> >> Many thanks!
>>> >>
>>> >> Shane.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2849 bytes --]

Re: [9fans] 9Cloud Source

[arisawa]

where is patch on http://9p.io/ ?
there are your patch on sources

grid% ls -l /n/sources/patch/syscall-*
--rw-rw-r-- M 105 fst sys 35842 Mar 17 09:52 /n/sources/patch/syscall-exportfs/chan.c
--rw-rw-r-- M 105 fst sys 35357 Mar 17 09:52 /n/sources/patch/syscall-exportfs/chan.c.orig
--rw-rw-rw- M 105 fst sys    27 Mar 17 09:51 /n/sources/patch/syscall-exportfs/email
--rw-rw-r-- M 105 fst sys 25215 Mar 17 09:52 /n/sources/patch/syscall-exportfs/exportfs.c
--rw-rw-r-- M 105 fst sys   306 Mar 17 09:52 /n/sources/patch/syscall-exportfs/files
--rw-rw-r-- M 105 fst sys 20634 Mar 17 09:51 /n/sources/patch/syscall-exportfs/libc.h
--rw-rw-r-- M 105 fst sys 20598 Mar 17 09:51 /n/sources/patch/syscall-exportfs/libc.h.orig
--rw-rw-r-- M 105 fst sys  4594 Mar 17 09:52 /n/sources/patch/syscall-exportfs/mkfile
--rw-rw-r-- M 105 fst sys  4580 Mar 17 09:52 /n/sources/patch/syscall-exportfs/mkfile.orig
--rw-rw-r-- M 105 fst sys     0 Mar 17 09:51 /n/sources/patch/syscall-exportfs/notes
--rw-rw-r-- M 105 fst sys 23608 Mar 17 09:52 /n/sources/patch/syscall-exportfs/portdat.h
--rw-rw-r-- M 105 fst sys 23541 Mar 17 09:52 /n/sources/patch/syscall-exportfs/portdat.h.orig
--rw-rw-r-- M 105 fst sys 11501 Mar 17 09:52 /n/sources/patch/syscall-exportfs/portfns.h
--rw-rw-r-- M 105 fst sys 11440 Mar 17 09:52 /n/sources/patch/syscall-exportfs/portfns.h.orig
--rw-rw-r-- M 105 fst sys   229 Mar 17 09:53 /n/sources/patch/syscall-exportfs/readme
--rw-rw-r-- M 105 fst sys   986 Mar 17 09:52 /n/sources/patch/syscall-exportfs/sys.h
--rw-rw-r-- M 105 fst sys   967 Mar 17 09:52 /n/sources/patch/syscall-exportfs/sys.h.orig
--rw-rw-r-- M 105 fst sys  8853 Mar 17 09:52 /n/sources/patch/syscall-exportfs/syscallfmt.c
--rw-rw-r-- M 105 fst sys  8853 Mar 17 09:52 /n/sources/patch/syscall-exportfs/syscallfmt.c.orig
--rw-rw-r-- M 105 fst sys  3403 Mar 17 09:52 /n/sources/patch/syscall-exportfs/systab.h
--rw-rw-r-- M 105 fst sys  3341 Mar 17 09:52 /n/sources/patch/syscall-exportfs/systab.h.orig
grid% 

> 2016/03/17 10:16、Skip Tavakkolian <skip.tavakkolian@gmail.com> のメール：
> 
> I couldn't find it on 9p.io, so I'm not sure what happened. I recall that I screwed up the first two attempts and had to ask David to clean them up for me.
> 
> Anyhow, I submitted the patch to Labs' sources a few minutes ago: /n/sources/patch/syscall-exportfs
> 
> 
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:18 PM Skip Tavakkolian <skip.tavakkolian@gmail.com> wrote:
> i mean "syscall-exportfs"
> 
> 
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 5:10 PM Skip Tavakkolian <skip.tavakkolian@gmail.com> wrote:
> i submitted the patch to 9p.io some time ago; it was under "syscall-exprotfs".
> 
> 
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:16 PM hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Skip, is there a way I could receive the patch for export?
> 
> On 7/15/15, Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com> wrote:
> > assuming you mean 9PCloud (otherwise ignore this):
> >
> > i plan to put the 9P javascript sources on github or bitbucket.  you
> > can view the sources using the debugger in chrome.  they're all
> > dual-licensed (MIT and GPLv2).  i also plan to make a simple version
> > of the namespace "janitor" (brucee coined the term) that uses factotum
> > handle auth.  it will be in the same source repo.
> >
> > the backend uses a custom Plan 9 cpu that includes the "export"
> > (exportfs) system call.  the patch for export was submitted to all
> > fronts, popular or otherwise (Labs, 9p.io, 9atom, 9front).
> >
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> Was wondering if the source of 9Cloud was available for perusal? Just
> >> logged in, looks great!
> >>
> >> Many thanks!
> >>
> >> Shane.
> >
> >
> >
> 

Re: [9fans] 9Cloud Source

[David du Colombier]

> I couldn't find it on 9p.io, so I'm not sure what happened. I recall
> that I screwed up the first two attempts and had to ask David to
> clean them up for me.
>
> Anyhow, I submitted the patch to Labs' sources a few minutes ago:
> /n/sources/patch/syscall-exportfs

Sorry, it got inadvertently deleted during the last synchronization
with /n/sources. I've just fixed it.

It's now available in /n/9p.io/patch/syscall-exportfs

--
David du Colombier

Re: [9fans] 9Cloud Source

[David du Colombier]

> where is patch on http://9p.io/ ?
> there are your patch on sources

https://9p.io/magic/webls?dir=/sources/patch/syscall-exportfs

--
David du Colombier

Re: [9fans] 9Cloud Source

[Skip Tavakkolian]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1454 bytes --]

There's a new patch in /n/sources/patch/kexportfs for two new cmds: ksrvfs
and kexportfs. They're based on srvfs and exportfs but kexportfs uses the
export system call.  Russ did the modifications back in 2005:

% ls -l
--rw-rw-r-- M 314 rsc sys 9222 Nov  2  2005 kexportfs.c
--rw-rw-r-- M 314 rsc sys 1760 Nov  2  2005 ksrvfs.c
--rw-rw-r-- M 314 rsc sys  300 Nov  2  2005 mkfile
--rwxrwxr-x M 314 rsc sys  338 Nov  2  2005 xtest


On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:16 PM hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Skip, is there a way I could receive the patch for export?
>
> On 7/15/15, Skip Tavakkolian <9nut@9netics.com> wrote:
> > assuming you mean 9PCloud (otherwise ignore this):
> >
> > i plan to put the 9P javascript sources on github or bitbucket.  you
> > can view the sources using the debugger in chrome.  they're all
> > dual-licensed (MIT and GPLv2).  i also plan to make a simple version
> > of the namespace "janitor" (brucee coined the term) that uses factotum
> > handle auth.  it will be in the same source repo.
> >
> > the backend uses a custom Plan 9 cpu that includes the "export"
> > (exportfs) system call.  the patch for export was submitted to all
> > fronts, popular or otherwise (Labs, 9p.io, 9atom, 9front).
> >
> >> Hi guys,
> >>
> >> Was wondering if the source of 9Cloud was available for perusal? Just
> >> logged in, looks great!
> >>
> >> Many thanks!
> >>
> >> Shane.
> >
> >
> >
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2104 bytes --]