wait! so, you had to make changes to Plan 9 to support Python? :) (sorry, couldn't resist) On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 12:38 PM, erik quanstrom wrote: > On Mon Dec 2 15:25:33 EST 2013, 0intro@gmail.com wrote: > > > > python on plan9 can't even handle the codereview extension. > > > > > > i believe that's false. jas' port does a lot of things the > > > prior port does not. it's on bitbucket. > > > > I agree with Erik. Jeff Sickel did a very good job on the > > modern Python port. > > > > If you are afraid to compile it, I'm providing up-to-date > > binaries (Python 2.7.5 and Mercurial 2.8.1) for Plan 9: > > it won't compile unless you're running 9atom. or have integrated > the (extensive) changes to ape, especially in the sockets area. > > - erik > >