The whole thing is a good discussion. plan9's design works, very well; for about 80% of would be users. For differently abled people in any capacity it all falls apart quickly. it's such a simple system though it wouldn't take much work to extend support wherever needed.

On Mon., Apr. 15, 2019, 12:26 a.m. Devine Lu Linvega, <aliceffekt@gmail.com> wrote:
Michelangelo would have been “middle-click!? Hell no”.

> On Apr 15, 2019, at 3:12 PM, Bakul Shah <bakul@bitblocks.com> wrote:
>
> Michelangelo or Rodin didn't have to worry about function, only form.
>
> Da Vinci on the other hand....
>
>> On Apr 14, 2019, at 10:07 PM, Lucio De Re <lucio.dere@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> The thing is, a UI is a combination of far too many personal tastes
>> and habits and a GUI multi-dimensionally more so. It's like a marble
>> slab that needs a Michelangelo to turn it into an image.
>>
>> We've had one Michelangelo and a Rodin and only a few Greek sculptors
>> in the past, what, three thousand years? Do we really think that a
>> near infinite number of monkeys is now going to solve that problem,
>> specially when the marble slab is undergoing its own metamorphosis
>> underfoot?
>>
>> Good luck!
>>
>> Lucio.
>>
>
>