Yep, with 3.1 9vx runs fine for an hour already. However, I want to
try installing Plan 9 natively. Tomorrow. Btw, why there are 9atom and
9front?
I mean, why they aren't joined together? What the difference between them?

2011/11/22 Skip Tavakkolian <skip.tavakkolian@gmail.com>

> i'll modify what i said to "... suspect the host os first".  it's been
> my experience that every autoupdate on Ubuntu and Windows brings in
> its share of new bugs (hopefully less than the number of bugs it
> fixes)
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:32 PM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>
> wrote:
> > On Mon Nov 21 15:20:58 EST 2011, skip.tavakkolian@gmail.com wrote:
> >> i run 9vx occasionally.  a while back i built 9vx from ron's
> >> repository.  i was having problems with it under Ubuntu 10.04 x86_64,
> >> where sometimes both cores were pegged at 100%; it was a problem with
> >> linux (judging by ubuntu mailing lists). without changing 9vx, things
> >> got stable after 10.10 (currently on 11.10). so, when in doubt,
> >> suspect the host os.
> >
> > !?  the fact that one bug was found in linux doesn't imply that bugs are
> likely
> > in any host os.  the oses are better tested than 9vx, so given no other
> information
> > i would conclude the opposite; 9vx is more likely at fault.  and
> regardless, we
> > have little chance of fixing the os.
> >
> > - erik
> >
> >
>
>