Yep, with 3.1 9vx runs fine for an hour already. However, I want to
try installing Plan 9 natively. Tomorrow. Btw, why there are 9atom and 9front?
I mean, why they aren't joined together? What the difference between them?

2011/11/22 Skip Tavakkolian <skip.tavakkolian@gmail.com>
i'll modify what i said to "... suspect the host os first".  it's been
my experience that every autoupdate on Ubuntu and Windows brings in
its share of new bugs (hopefully less than the number of bugs it
fixes)

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:32 PM, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
> On Mon Nov 21 15:20:58 EST 2011, skip.tavakkolian@gmail.com wrote:
>> i run 9vx occasionally.  a while back i built 9vx from ron's
>> repository.  i was having problems with it under Ubuntu 10.04 x86_64,
>> where sometimes both cores were pegged at 100%; it was a problem with
>> linux (judging by ubuntu mailing lists). without changing 9vx, things
>> got stable after 10.10 (currently on 11.10). so, when in doubt,
>> suspect the host os.
>
> !?  the fact that one bug was found in linux doesn't imply that bugs are likely
> in any host os.  the oses are better tested than 9vx, so given no other information
> i would conclude the opposite; 9vx is more likely at fault.  and regardless, we
> have little chance of fixing the os.
>
> - erik
>
>