My mistake for hastiness: should we implement the filesystem in kernel or
user space?

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Charlie Lin <charlielin65@gmail.com> wrote:

> Like efivarfs in the Linux kernel
>
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Charlie Lin <charlielin65@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> My idea: implement a user-space filesystem to expose all EFI variables.
>> As for the bootloader, any ideas?
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Kurt H Maier <khm@sciops.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 07:21:14PM -0500, Charlie Lin wrote:
>>> > Add one more: EFI support
>>> > Also, can Plan 9 be booted on Open Firmware? (Used on at least Sun
>>> SPARC
>>> > workstations)
>>> >
>>> > On Nov 16, 2016 5:27 PM, "Charlie Lin" <charlielin65@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Any plans for Plan 9 5th edition?
>>> > >
>>> > > My desires:
>>> > > ISO-compliant C compiler and preprocessor
>>> > > Port other programming languages (especially Go) to here
>>> > > Start a source code repository
>>> > > Port Git, SVN, Mercurial, et cetera to here
>>> > >
>>>
>>>
>>> These are great ideas, is there some central place you can write these
>>> down so we don't lose track of our goals
>>>
>>>
>>
>