From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140519230225.Horde.5MmCmKbYSCgLlmaP7PPNFQ1@ssl.eumx.net> References: <92606a17ce255a2e74049e4090d948b3@proxima.alt.za> <36c5eca0f06e9acbe2fac19067f457d8@ladd.quanstro.net> <20140519195016.B21E6B827@mail.bitblocks.com> <3a6dcbf0845989d60e627ad4e5df4313@ladd.quanstro.net> <20140519230225.Horde.5MmCmKbYSCgLlmaP7PPNFQ1@ssl.eumx.net> Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 17:06:15 -0600 Message-ID: From: andrey mirtchovski To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [9fans] syscall 53 Topicbox-Message-UUID: e930aad2-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 golang-dev has more clout than 9fans nowadays, at least as it pertains to plan9. On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 5:02 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote: > Quoting ron minnich : > >> And, again, I was not inclined to act on any of this until the >> discussion on the golang-dev list, which boiled down to: >> "if you can do it with a single system call, you should" with a >> response of "we put in a patch, was not accepted yet.". I just renewed >> the request to reexamine the patch. > > > Does anyone know how we can get golang-dev to endorse all of the > ethernet drivers that the labs refuses to merge? I can send them > some ad money or some web software or whatever motivates them > > khm > >