From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140519231232.Horde.xWPdnU_4UAk6dvlshwIg4A7@ssl.eumx.net> References: <92606a17ce255a2e74049e4090d948b3@proxima.alt.za> <36c5eca0f06e9acbe2fac19067f457d8@ladd.quanstro.net> <20140519195016.B21E6B827@mail.bitblocks.com> <3a6dcbf0845989d60e627ad4e5df4313@ladd.quanstro.net> <20140519230225.Horde.5MmCmKbYSCgLlmaP7PPNFQ1@ssl.eumx.net> <20140519231232.Horde.xWPdnU_4UAk6dvlshwIg4A7@ssl.eumx.net> Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 17:17:17 -0600 Message-ID: From: andrey mirtchovski To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [9fans] syscall 53 Topicbox-Message-UUID: e93ac116-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 I suggest personal notes, flowers, and some hard liquor. On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Kurt H Maier wrote: > Quoting andrey mirtchovski : > >> golang-dev has more clout than 9fans nowadays, at least as it pertains to >> plan9. >> > > That's why I'm asking. We now have three go-related new syscalls, while > lots of actual hardware support gets flushed down the toilet for > unspecified reasons. I'm not complaining; I'm just wondering how to > adapt to the new system. Sending code to the labs directly doesn't work; > fine. How do we lobby golang-dev? > > khm > >