From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from tb-mx0.topicbox.com (localhost.local [127.0.0.1]) by tb-mx0.topicbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B831261098C for <9fans@9fans.net>; Sun, 10 May 2020 00:51:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from staal1978@gmail.com) Received: from tb-mx0.topicbox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tb-mx0.topicbox.com (Authentication Milter) with ESMTP id 062677047AB; Sun, 10 May 2020 00:51:21 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; d=topicbox.com; s=arcseal; t= 1589086281; b=vWluiVZdicVZFWedcjXGQZ04gfs8pg9wt8l4PA0Uf/I+oA9pXZ buyIiYC1FJF/S4nyX3bkMg8OcCeFT0lhQORRpKcnf40Kzjc92vlZt3tFMNtLLnQF eAS/5NxAoinXpyrRWDfblDjVOUEzDrjMVufGWZ2jGMOOUkQ1egH/LxYdFIlGQws0 pohA6GFRDWol84ge8vWa2QHRG5G3UBmhJAlTBzn1hdfA3bt+F9gmcc7QLyOpxRKz 6+a9TKUalfg/3T1ofpiILCtacBF2ZUPhv9j1+HqFhEMHBdjwtMZyGY79AbTwlJQz xPRTFHocLmm6Tu58I2LhgN76HkwryeBlboQA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= topicbox.com; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=arcseal; t=1589086281; bh=TpNai7sl7FaZebv4NyGmoe8gVubmRqfmi/kX+bb3jG4=; b=dDf4w1fomowS ZfuYIxCaUeL1hKQlLTZHMq0BH0xVX4OieE/Pg+UolYrU/+7sMKUfAaB31hJozd6s 7U7/wwJL6NeBgwJIP+IalZrtkzfCKh4y/SWmx2Hc3LMHlVhn1qHXFRgCl1FmwvGz PO+skqz3YtSBZUPrQF98DItB5Xj5bWeFvNis8iHp21uan5Sx8rAIPnDJWe2vUK8V 2ruHstgO2f0MK8C13wS0pNb+Cc97xTpuFINjEhttUEta5g9aSYBzqFXGeKFGg8gR ndomkVW+nb0NGfxLAMquJBBWc+Xm7UdhrV5VGm/Em/V7FJyrobICsmNCTjUSg+9K Y8Ky7XiYaQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; tb-mx0.topicbox.com; arc=none (no signatures found); bimi=none (Domain is not BIMI enabled); dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=kx++8ezP header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 x-bits=2048; dmarc=pass policy.published-domain-policy=none policy.published-subdomain-policy=quarantine policy.applied-disposition=none policy.evaluated-disposition=none (p=none,sp=quarantine,d=none,d.eval=none) policy.policy-from=p header.from=gmail.com; iprev=pass smtp.remote-ip=209.85.208.182 (mail-lj1-f182.google.com); spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=staal1978@gmail.com smtp.helo=mail-lj1-f182.google.com; x-aligned-from=pass (Address match); x-google-dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key) header.d=1e100.net header.i=@1e100.net header.b=ukz38OL9; x-ptr=pass smtp.helo=mail-lj1-f182.google.com policy.ptr=mail-lj1-f182.google.com; x-return-mx=pass header.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-tls=pass smtp.version=TLSv1.2 smtp.cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 smtp.bits=256/256; x-vs=clean score=0 state=0 Authentication-Results: tb-mx0.topicbox.com; arc=none (no signatures found); bimi=none (Domain is not BIMI enabled); dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=kx++8ezP header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 x-bits=2048; dmarc=pass policy.published-domain-policy=none policy.published-subdomain-policy=quarantine policy.applied-disposition=none policy.evaluated-disposition=none (p=none,sp=quarantine,d=none,d.eval=none) policy.policy-from=p header.from=gmail.com; iprev=pass smtp.remote-ip=209.85.208.182 (mail-lj1-f182.google.com); spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=staal1978@gmail.com smtp.helo=mail-lj1-f182.google.com; x-aligned-from=pass (Address match); x-google-dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key) header.d=1e100.net header.i=@1e100.net header.b=ukz38OL9; x-ptr=pass smtp.helo=mail-lj1-f182.google.com policy.ptr=mail-lj1-f182.google.com; x-return-mx=pass header.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-tls=pass smtp.version=TLSv1.2 smtp.cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 smtp.bits=256/256; x-vs=clean score=0 state=0 X-ME-VSCause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrkeeigdekiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpuffr tefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepgghfjgfhff fkuffvtgesrgdtreertddtjeenucfhrhhomheplfgvnhhsucfuthgrrghluceoshhtrggr lhduleejkeesghhmrghilhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepffdvkeehgeelke ehueelffettdeiueehtdduhfegtdevudeugeelveejkeeggeegnecuffhomhgrihhnpehg ihhthhhusgdrtghomhdpthhophhitggsohigrdgtohhmnecukfhppedvtdelrdekhedrvd dtkedrudekvdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpedv tdelrdekhedrvddtkedrudekvddphhgvlhhopehmrghilhdqlhhjuddqfhdukedvrdhgoh hoghhlvgdrtghomhdpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpeeoshhtrggrlhduleejkeesghhmrghilhdr tghomhequcfukfgkgfepjedvledv X-ME-VSScore: 0 X-ME-VSCategory: clean Received-SPF: pass (gmail.com ... _spf.google.com: Sender is authorized to use 'staal1978@gmail.com' in 'mfrom' identity (mechanism 'include:_netblocks.google.com' matched)) receiver=tb-mx0.topicbox.com; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from="staal1978@gmail.com"; helo=mail-lj1-f182.google.com; client-ip=209.85.208.182 Received: from mail-lj1-f182.google.com (mail-lj1-f182.google.com [209.85.208.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tb-mx0.topicbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <9fans@9fans.net>; Sun, 10 May 2020 00:51:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from staal1978@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-f182.google.com with SMTP id o14so4807865ljp.4 for <9fans@9fans.net>; Sat, 09 May 2020 21:51:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=TpNai7sl7FaZebv4NyGmoe8gVubmRqfmi/kX+bb3jG4=; b=kx++8ezPvFbJnfOjrLhrrSthMXpgM9gykpAOo0cNeavTbNS4S1Oau1nRJUvctIxBC5 44ip4yxDr8KbrqmyNP9NkJF+rdb80B405gSEsns5lVdj3Xg8BUFKYJAvcNu91uA9zeuv FM06WXFpTbJA5QWKQKzmNQReTW4fR7TrApO2ME95LJUUsuplSzcEbuXKqyyC+ku9dtQ1 q85nMPUvMPThclIwrtaem2K/NhhAHAjACyZolWhmaDVc4UslBM31MRfaAaHUVj4udxFM 8eRboszcST4YqeFVrasE999o28G8dtjs79ElfCAd9EqZyzhylFiYK0de7MDvgkh5Scy7 0+wQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=TpNai7sl7FaZebv4NyGmoe8gVubmRqfmi/kX+bb3jG4=; b=ukz38OL9SK3Qn7q+7csUhaans47cg64zYQ6bN246Nt7Ap30hk0VPsMI58HIK3nruqY 7x09tSsYMJAhQ4dFA8qaEXhXNqBXz1jIbDjtFwsD8q7u6JIsbsY7/N4Ar5a9eCIrs35d 1FNrrTVxgj1LSQmr6sveSEGW3GnM6Jqp2SGYAuH8J2VDtXFoMhHQ5xMDyjK4kMlYIsVt EkxvDA/CmKk7NwQrZmJJCdljtXp2uGt1HZCl8T6sDdu2Dw6VcpAQF/Ve0oS9v7XU0fxB VzYPrrh/28dhWM68nZ0Fuhbxy8pBTcliSkMbOb6ep7lMpQ9XXj+auHSxUCkE7QQeP/BG z0XQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533PWmwid3a1YDY4bpNSB36sbH5OiJ58w4aTiJkbUWAfcVnhB1Gp 69juIkEM7ul6O042KLh09Ii+ThLxZzV5NPAFkkcWH5Qt X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyzY10WkM/FRFbICe/y1gqNy4RnmKgvv/Sv/stJoGb84nEYvbq3T6EjE7VlgmvQgUWl3jCcogiQ1NrJH9debfI= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a58e:: with SMTP id m14mr6296599ljp.95.1589086279512; Sat, 09 May 2020 21:51:19 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Jens Staal Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 06:51:09 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [9fans] Software preservation in the post-hg era To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000035396905a543fb03" Topicbox-Policy-Reasoning: allow: sender is a member Topicbox-Message-UUID: e7761102-9279-11ea-82f5-b6ff10fa202c --00000000000035396905a543fb03 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Den tors 7 maj 2020 16:17Dave MacFarlane skrev: > > On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 9:12 PM Sean Hinchee wrote: > >> As a footnote, there's a decent git client written in Go that works >> alright on plan9 [4], but it's slow and memory intensive at the >> moment. >> >> > [...] > > [4] https://github.com/driusan/dgit >> > > This (and the fact that the speed of Go on Plan9/amd64 seems to be finally > be useable enough to do development again as of 1.14..) finally gave me the > kick I needed to fix some of the hacks that were causing performance > problems on clone. The self-clone time went from ~160s to ~13s on my > machine (compared to ~8s with "real" git) If there's other parts that you > were referring to as being slow and memory intensive let me know (or if you > still find it's memory intensive, I didn't benchmark that part..) > > - Dave > How does it compare performance wise with git9 ? https://github.com/oridb/git9 *9fans * / 9fans / see discussions > + participants > + delivery options > Permalink > > --00000000000035396905a543fb03 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Den tors 7 maj 2020 16:17Dave MacFarlane <driusan@gmail.com> skrev:

On = Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 9:12 PM Sean Hinchee <henesy.dev@gmail.com>= ; wrote:
As a footnote, there's a decent git client written in Go that works
alright on plan9 [4], but it's slow and memory intensive at the
moment.


[...]

<= blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-l= eft:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">[4] https= ://github.com/driusan/dgit

This (an= d the fact that the speed of Go on Plan9/amd64 seems to be finally be useab= le enough to do development again as of 1.14..) finally gave me the kick I = needed to fix some of the hacks that were causing performance problems on c= lone. The self-clone time went from ~160s to ~13s on my machine (compared t= o ~8s with "real" git) If there's other parts that you were r= eferring to as being slow and memory intensive let me know (or if you still= find it's memory intensive, I didn't benchmark that part..)
<= div>
- Dave
<= /div>


How does it compare performance wise with git9 ?



--00000000000035396905a543fb03--