From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20120831222403.GA81150@intma.in>
References: <20120828150521.GA10731@intma.in>
	<ea7f747589a78f5d1c0ed50a9a5b6ab7@proxima.alt.za>
	<20120828153548.GC11005@intma.in>
	<CAK=G1TjccyV2Zy0zR+hf4DMe2mGRg44D9WkKR66V=yHy-kHY8g@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120831222403.GA81150@intma.in>
Date: Sat,  1 Sep 2012 01:00:01 +0200
Message-ID: <CAK=G1Tj_GSm704BtckwsEnpAH9Q17-iu+4Z_prGdxB+roJgAjQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Uriel <uriel@berlinblue.org>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] rc vs sh
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b560d5fc-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Kurt H Maier <khm-9@intma.in> wrote:
>
> Just for the record, nothing's changed:
>
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:44:04PM +0200, Uriel wrote:
>> Where did the Go team say explicitly they are not interested in a
>> better build system?
>
> http://goo.gl/AtBrC
>

A lot has changed, the current build system has barely a handful of
lines of (ba)sh left in it.

Whatever I can convince Russ that it is OK to remove the little that
is left will depend on whatever other people make the case or just
give up and go away, because they can't be bothered to explain their
points to Russ.

Really, that of all the people in the world, I'm the one that has to
try to fight for consensus, communication and cooperation... maybe the
world is really hopeless. *sigh*

Uriel