From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <85E8CE08-987D-449F-B4C3-98A54F2D3B57@fb.com> References: <85E8CE08-987D-449F-B4C3-98A54F2D3B57@fb.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 14:11:07 -0400 Message-ID: From: Lee Fallat To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [9fans] simplest disk filesystem Topicbox-Message-UUID: 03420006-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 I don't know anything about ramfs but maybe you can modify it to read all disk from storage then write back when done? Sounds really inefficient though. Maybe if it was done with system files it'd be more practical. AFAIK, but a bit off topic, DamnSmallLinux can do this. Maybe you'd like to check that out. On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Yoann Padioleau wrote: > But I would like something that actually can persist =E2=80=A6 a real but= simple storage > persistent filesystem. > > On Jul 15, 2014, at 10:57 AM, andrey mirtchovski = wrote: > >> /sys/src/cmd/ramfs.c? >> >> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 11:53 AM, Yoann Padioleau wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> What is the simplest storage filesystem in terms of code size in plan9? >>> I=E2=80=99m looking for a very simple in-kernel filesystem. Maybe older= version of plan9 >>> was including such a filesystem? On Linux for instance the minixfs was = probably >>> the simplest filesystem. The dos must also be simple but it=E2=80=99s c= urrently a fileserver >>> which makes it sligtly more complicated. >> > >