From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKzdPgyH8jcHmYJGROFZHuNfk=suyNtP9nanOYNU5DL39T-doA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKzdPgyKUraeKdkTO9dpKRxKNJUZx4eP1tOaowVYsmU8Yxg6dg@mail.gmail.com>
	<04ad41f64fa7a4e4d594e8927c0c973a@quintile.net>
	<CAKzHxzHUtA1ga7qi60FOPOX=ZsGBPfDv5B+wNAd94WVrCgXSZw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKzdPgyH8jcHmYJGROFZHuNfk=suyNtP9nanOYNU5DL39T-doA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon,  2 Jun 2014 19:19:00 -0400
Message-ID: <CAKzHxzHAHsc7hh9rQJMnEPFaMhwwLLHPvChQpygVsByTBnx4fw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lee Fallat <ircsurfer33@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] sam for Windows?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f4a1f2f4-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

I just checked on a friend's laptop (AMD64 Windows install)- it works.
What doesn't work is this:

http://plan9.bell-labs.com/netlib/research/sam.exe

...because it is a 32-bit installer.

The link in my previous email though, contains a sam that does run! :)

Cheers,

Lee

On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 7:01 PM, Rob Pike <robpike@gmail.com> wrote:
> The old version of sam does not run on 64 bits, I am told.
>
> -rob
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Lee Fallat <ircsurfer33@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Does that old version of sam[1] not run on 64-bit Windows?
>>
>> 1: http://plan9.bell-labs.com/sources/extra/9pm051031.zip (the version I ran
>> awhile ago at my college that I think run 64-bit Windows...).
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Steve Simon <steve@quintile.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> The short answer is no.
>>>
>>> there is the pf9 package which would probably be the
>>> best starting point.
>>>
>>> https://bitbucket.org/knieriem/pf9
>>>
>>> I have a similar but less complete toolkit myself, and I
>>> still run 32 bit plan9 tools on windows.
>>>
>>> -Steve
>>>
>>
>