From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKzHxzHUtA1ga7qi60FOPOX=ZsGBPfDv5B+wNAd94WVrCgXSZw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKzdPgyKUraeKdkTO9dpKRxKNJUZx4eP1tOaowVYsmU8Yxg6dg@mail.gmail.com>
	<04ad41f64fa7a4e4d594e8927c0c973a@quintile.net>
	<CAKzHxzHUtA1ga7qi60FOPOX=ZsGBPfDv5B+wNAd94WVrCgXSZw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rob Pike <robpike@gmail.com>
Date: Mon,  2 Jun 2014 16:01:11 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKzdPgyH8jcHmYJGROFZHuNfk=suyNtP9nanOYNU5DL39T-doA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] sam for Windows?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f439a88e-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

The old version of sam does not run on 64 bits, I am told.

-rob


On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Lee Fallat <ircsurfer33@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does that old version of sam[1] not run on 64-bit Windows?
>
> 1: http://plan9.bell-labs.com/sources/extra/9pm051031.zip (the version I ran
> awhile ago at my college that I think run 64-bit Windows...).
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:08 PM, Steve Simon <steve@quintile.net> wrote:
>>
>> The short answer is no.
>>
>> there is the pf9 package which would probably be the
>> best starting point.
>>
>> https://bitbucket.org/knieriem/pf9
>>
>> I have a similar but less complete toolkit myself, and I
>> still run 32 bit plan9 tools on windows.
>>
>> -Steve
>>
>