On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 10:36:44AM -0700, erik quanstrom wrote:
> > This is tantamount to saying acme is superior because you are better at
> > acme.  [...]
>
> c'mon man.  you follow this with several paragraphs of opinion which appear
> to say that acme is not better because you don't like it.

Yes, having explicitly set the dimensions of the field, I proceeded to
stay in bounds.

> but then again, editors don't tend to lead to logical arguments.  :-)

I've never seen it happen, and I don't really expect to.  I do maintain
that calling acme an editor is akin to calling New York a shopping
center.

khm