From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E74238DA-2542-4D66-8B1D-4862255A11CB@orthanc.ca>
References: <CAL3m8eAf2Yjpg77wtykTSPnyKHxKHYc5YWfWH2L8CNjc86P1kA@mail.gmail.c>
	<ce2b9be49cd24c465103d803e3c93050@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<CAL3m8eDMXC2STjFjBUurmdY5DynCOrpqwE-ViRuSubfF6HjBOw@mail.gmail.com>
	<A9FD554E-2263-4B14-BC82-AB0BA783725A@orthanc.ca>
	<CA+4OWrwGgkYfuj2t4dkWsZHFex4oFTveDq_9A+yr=TsNpG0C8g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAL3m8eCJughpHZ6htHyLyq9vORA+z5ajpWMbWjnCTVZ+YZRv9g@mail.gmail.com>
	<E74238DA-2542-4D66-8B1D-4862255A11CB@orthanc.ca>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:01:44 -0500
Message-ID: <CAL3m8eBs3=VtAVb20GN3n_EyEgnY1O5Hx0GztU2_A8e-w6d0NA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Strake <strake888@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] AMD64 system
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 7e63b0ce-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 25/04/2012, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> wrote:
> Anyway, I was just curious to see what specific real case you had for
> needing 64 bits.

The main one is this: I have a 64-bit machine, and I'll be damned if
my programs won't use every last one of them (^_~)