On Mon Dec 9 17:54:11 EST 2013, conor.williams@gmail.com wrote:sure. but that's not engineering. engineering is balancing the cost
> FLAC seems huge (again) compared to Mp3 but I will try the Flac - according
> to:
> http://www.head-fi.org/t/654057/alac-vs-flac
> there is good compression alright...
of a resource vs the benefit. so we're trading storage against sound
quality. storage is ~$15/GB, and sound quality is subjective. so
it's up to the customer to determine where on this continuum the
solution should be. but it does seem a tad rich to say that an extra
$10 or so of storage is extravagant (assuming steve's 50% compression.)
- erik