From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 29872 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2021 08:45:48 -0000 Received: from tb-ob1.topicbox.com (64.147.108.173) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 20 Sep 2021 08:45:48 -0000 Received: from tb-mx0.topicbox.com (tb-mx0.nyi.icgroup.com [10.90.30.73]) by tb-ob1.topicbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447DD19F9C for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 04:45:48 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bounce.mM080aad5bb3d8f05354a56fc5.r522be890-2105-11eb-b15e-8d699134e1fa@9fans.bounce.topicbox.com) Received: by tb-mx0.topicbox.com (Postfix, from userid 1132) id 418A84019EF7; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 04:45:48 -0400 (EDT) ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; topicbox.com; arc=pass; dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=bpeJGcgY header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 x-bits=2048; dmarc=pass policy.published-domain-policy=none policy.published-subdomain-policy=quarantine policy.applied-disposition=none policy.evaluated-disposition=none (p=none,sp=quarantine,d=none,d.eval=none) policy.policy-from=p header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=conor.williams@gmail.com smtp.helo=mail-ot1-f41.google.com; x-internal-arc=fail (as.1.topicbox.com=pass, ams.1.topicbox.com=fail (body has been altered)) (Message modified while forwarding at Topicbox) ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= topicbox.com; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:list-help:list-id:list-post :list-subscribe:reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :list-unsubscribe; s=sysmsg-1; t=1632127548; bh=zlOzFqgxQ/Ri/9+M 738LTsDQ5w6n04wwKSEagCO6bjY=; b=NZQ57IzVnSbD6XunPf4GgH4A5A0vmr0K WT7+QbZRWXXngT04xTtjRBiVpai+2x+FOGpcTw6xeZXCQWH/GUCleBgqIQwf/JSC INn4DthuEjqeGYlK2vvJftdL0SOEHjLDl1UiIsR3LrkyYJncOLNXn4Jg8KZqif3L JCNaSJ8IFdY= ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; cv=pass; d=topicbox.com; s=sysmsg-1; t= 1632127548; b=SxGZmzf59QbCgMsl6HNEkkB6FL5D2HcmpFp9m8Wqj2URRgl/Qa MJrwC23ZGtomtIElmB6+YtnwrRi5dmzYUkYSCMpffgl9FnkKlsWPd8FvwX4QjyqT 55EkGCcPEnrmJqqZXFzdIuhQpmcT7Ub6vy3jTv80/Nqt5kcapzi36VDEA= Authentication-Results: topicbox.com; arc=pass; dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=bpeJGcgY header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 x-bits=2048; dmarc=pass policy.published-domain-policy=none policy.published-subdomain-policy=quarantine policy.applied-disposition=none policy.evaluated-disposition=none (p=none,sp=quarantine,d=none,d.eval=none) policy.policy-from=p header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=conor.williams@gmail.com smtp.helo=mail-ot1-f41.google.com; x-internal-arc=fail (as.1.topicbox.com=pass, ams.1.topicbox.com=fail (body has been altered)) (Message modified while forwarding at Topicbox) X-Received-Authentication-Results: tb-mx0.topicbox.com; arc=none (no signatures found); bimi=skipped (DMARC Policy is not at enforcement); dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=bpeJGcgY header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 x-bits=2048; dmarc=pass policy.published-domain-policy=none policy.published-subdomain-policy=quarantine policy.applied-disposition=none policy.evaluated-disposition=none (p=none,sp=quarantine,d=none,d.eval=none) policy.policy-from=p header.from=gmail.com; iprev=pass smtp.remote-ip=209.85.210.41 (mail-ot1-f41.google.com); spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=conor.williams@gmail.com smtp.helo=mail-ot1-f41.google.com; x-aligned-from=pass (Address match); x-google-dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key) header.d=1e100.net header.i=@1e100.net header.b=XhPjLWHC; x-me-sender=none; x-ptr=pass smtp.helo=mail-ot1-f41.google.com policy.ptr=mail-ot1-f41.google.com; x-return-mx=pass header.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-tls=pass smtp.version=TLSv1.2 smtp.cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 smtp.bits=256/256; x-vs=clean score=0 state=0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=9fans.net; h= mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject :to:content-type:list-help:list-id:list-post:list-subscribe :reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:list-unsubscribe; s=dkim-1; bh=BMpm3jvUr9WU+oODNwRLXSkRTmJ50Is4CZlJIlyHvdY=; b=oIvheJ1JOLHd XyZ1vKeWtV3yV/dLF7ax2kAJ1g412V2nRBNsHPc9UvNOwORrWpiz87vRm7ILXFWC 7Wfe6Z/zaTvic/ILasW2no0rpPgjpB7bufSTgy5iG4tiBnslZAOXr9tI5VCg8L/Z usjGQcWZwSUsoWiZFGV0eibw9C0BzKI= Received: from tb-mx0.topicbox.com (localhost.local [127.0.0.1]) by tb-mx0.topicbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3274B4019AFA for <9fans@9fans.net>; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 04:45:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from conor.williams@gmail.com) Received: from tb-mx0.topicbox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tb-mx0.topicbox.com (Authentication Milter) with ESMTP id A3311C3CADC; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 04:45:38 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; d=topicbox.com; s=arcseal; t= 1632127538; b=ZtF1fPdT+tNO7ytaBmcLoy6JZlDLr91ue2QRNdKwxxd5pnWK3m MayGVcdwx8i5IT2sMMr339da0UGfN06pqpRZDdT5WTyUQZSl7kg3vxZ79d5r7O87 peUNNSM1M6gfyxw11M+qGm3bVgvRfFe8hy+7bC5MKsPZ5iLWLkhJIT9MrniJsDQS Z0KnQ5VNDW0bk0915H54/29fR4sGQqrWnejp0dWvHvJlmdhMsrsVwfPDsRS79Snq UrtoVQ5BsvNUE+NiTQxAUGBRjJVBFZ2i6ZU7Ld2vU8ZY7EZvzqJV/tRXh0ey6yX/ XVBYrUDjia+jUcn8DjDvfPu2h6vr/kyzVFHw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= topicbox.com; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=arcseal; t=1632127538; bh=o3T7GpArLwWiC/9ryhBOyFBxXYf1oI2JGRjFLmmRB8s=; b=v2eiD8m6TZnZ FqGOV04HfsHeD7kC3069LhBFEG8GwM0PfkTE09GH7hlNN47v+0o128k17WaKwdJR 2Sjaw0P7CR89wTF8PNJkIP9tJJ7reKpuPIFAW8mfMj2abnINzMMdCXK1ivbiFf6J 7o2jEyryNtefs/zEmKIM6YZiqIYko/P6FnGKGZtOUuu0CRAJBsHjJO2cu2bh8iNw zo/EsbsjQ7cg8YuD7OuVuLD3Dg2hsK5xHo/PcKnMjbze3ga1ssRFimAL1NeHFWR6 U7gVwCOPxC53XrQqMyq96RzmVTfP2gOLZnlBDqz7lw0vj8MgQG1+3+KA3XFp4M+i aokwU+10og== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; tb-mx0.topicbox.com; arc=none (no signatures found); bimi=skipped (DMARC Policy is not at enforcement); dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=bpeJGcgY header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 x-bits=2048; dmarc=pass policy.published-domain-policy=none policy.published-subdomain-policy=quarantine policy.applied-disposition=none policy.evaluated-disposition=none (p=none,sp=quarantine,d=none,d.eval=none) policy.policy-from=p header.from=gmail.com; iprev=pass smtp.remote-ip=209.85.210.41 (mail-ot1-f41.google.com); spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=conor.williams@gmail.com smtp.helo=mail-ot1-f41.google.com; x-aligned-from=pass (Address match); x-google-dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key) header.d=1e100.net header.i=@1e100.net header.b=XhPjLWHC; x-me-sender=none; x-ptr=pass smtp.helo=mail-ot1-f41.google.com policy.ptr=mail-ot1-f41.google.com; x-return-mx=pass header.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-tls=pass smtp.version=TLSv1.2 smtp.cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 smtp.bits=256/256; x-vs=clean score=0 state=0 X-ME-VSCause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudeitddgieefucdltddurdegudehrddttd dmucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgf nhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttd enucenucfjughrpeggfhgjhfffkffuvfgtsegrtderredttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeevohhn ohhrucghihhllhhirghmshcuoegtohhnohhrrdifihhllhhirghmshesghhmrghilhdrtg homheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepueekfeeutdefgefhffetfeevvdeiueettdfffefh vdffteevfefggeehfedutefgnecuffhomhgrihhnpegtmhhurdgvughupdhoshguvghvrd horhhgpdhgihhthhhusgdrtghomhdpthhophhitggsohigrdgtohhmnecukfhppedvtdel rdekhedrvddutddrgedunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehinh gvthepvddtledrkeehrddvuddtrdeguddphhgvlhhopehmrghilhdqohhtuddqfheguddr ghhoohhglhgvrdgtohhmpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoegtohhnohhrrdifihhllhhirghmsh esghhmrghilhdrtghomheq X-ME-VSScore: 0 X-ME-VSCategory: clean Received-SPF: pass (gmail.com ... _spf.google.com: Sender is authorized to use 'conor.williams@gmail.com' in 'mfrom' identity (mechanism 'include:_netblocks.google.com' matched)) receiver=tb-mx0.topicbox.com; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from="conor.williams@gmail.com"; helo=mail-ot1-f41.google.com; client-ip=209.85.210.41 Received: from mail-ot1-f41.google.com (mail-ot1-f41.google.com [209.85.210.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tb-mx0.topicbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <9fans@9fans.net>; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 04:45:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from conor.williams@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-f41.google.com with SMTP id c6-20020a9d2786000000b005471981d559so1124951otb.5 for <9fans@9fans.net>; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 01:45:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=o3T7GpArLwWiC/9ryhBOyFBxXYf1oI2JGRjFLmmRB8s=; b=XhPjLWHCLDyjw/Odwso0tZ+PhEsY1PBCktLbP1C32HQGG+avW+lZYZh/MOkh+DLJoF ESYs16UXctqvD79siR4oWd5RPrQ2LpX7J0hOF99O8SCG8PAkSlmcQ7s1i0RIMqZ6gMsz i1sU0+IRhZ07IZMCnEbCRN3j6MoCKN7uGqXTb7trhvyFOk300DbXE+fNKynvwxyYB/5L ku4romnhR2maejVK9T+CI5cDdbb+j1eWNn4oB4+BdMhO19h9emitIaLf7K5b02oehZF2 vxiYV5X0/qQ/is2bk3Hu0uVdZhP5nXyvnMXUoO9GedaOvvxWmC4z4fTTAfl6myf5/Qst lvww== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533kuIj++h9lJBrdkq79Q5uzyv7MBZNR4yiOT7R+RHE52CHAKxPo P9R+kCTMpfxU7hXzgYGAxE8cx0KpY8AHoWymFjnwxESto/jR48JGw28= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwy0nKV+X/XqsHxsT/WI3ZTzmru/Fv7rAAotv0NOKRxtcuoZA8AzRNpAu8YGxW0bgDUv6aMiH1npmpU7OQwRhM= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:788:: with SMTP id w8mr20958470ots.235.1632127536925; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 01:45:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <15937.1632116621@lunacy.ugrad.cs.cmu.edu> <565ccec9-0efb-45ad-9d08-dbfe6ed35bd5@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Conor Williams Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 08:45:24 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [9fans] GSoC 2021 project ideas To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000011104705cc694ee2" Topicbox-Policy-Reasoning: allow: sender is a member Topicbox-Message-UUID: 238e5232-19ef-11ec-98cc-c166b0313629 Archived-At: =?UTF-8?B?PGh0dHBzOi8vOWZhbnMudG9waWNib3guY29tL2dyb3Vwcy85?= =?UTF-8?B?ZmFucy9UMzlhZWM4ZjNmOWQ4NTAzZC1NMDgwYWFkNWJiM2Q4ZjA1MzU0YTU2?= =?UTF-8?B?ZmM1Pg==?= List-Help: List-Id: "9fans" <9fans.9fans.net> List-Post: List-Software: Topicbox v0 List-Subscribe: Precedence: list Reply-To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Unsubscribe: , Topicbox-Delivery-ID: 2:9fans:437d30aa-c441-11e9-8a57-d036212d11b0:522be890-2105-11eb-b15e-8d699134e1fa:M080aad5bb3d8f05354a56fc5:1:MPWrARSE0H8BSrLTlmmYOIF04GOqLopop1hy64nrqsI --00000000000011104705cc694ee2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable i figured out the random hack which messed me up 12 years ago 2 days ago /c:f20 and the buda bug is fixed on my system - took me 3 days strait to find it... and the fuseblk hack took a while /c:2021 On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:39 AM Conor Williams wrote: > if it is a vfat filesystem it is ok.... > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:37 AM Conor Williams > wrote: > >> some of the fuseblk disc/k drivers/modules on peppermint which is a >> flavour of ubuntu >> are not even in the kernel space and there are mount.XYZ processes left >> open which are >> wide open to attack (with # fuser -p ) /c09 >> for those chips tings >> >> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:24 AM hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> i think the main reason people are willing to fall for the android >>> platform is bec. there is no good long-term supply of updated phone >>> hardware with backwards-compatible interfaces. >>> >>> a lot of qualcomm and mediatek chipsets are being built, but instead >>> of documentation they only ship half-baked linux drivers, which are >>> often not even mainlined. >>> >>> those linux drivers are already hard to make work on actual linux >>> distributions, or even on android distributions. >>> >>> who wants to reverse-engineer the hardware over and over again based >>> on such linux drivers... >>> >>> On 9/20/21, Ethan Gardener wrote: >>> > tl;dr: forget inferno, port plan 9 to the pine phone. >>> > >>> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021, at 6:43 AM, Dave Eckhardt wrote: >>> >> > Anyone know if this project went anywhere? >>> >> > >>> >> > https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~412/lectures/L05_Purge_Proposal.pdf >>> > >>> > I had to laugh at one of the slides. Inferno running natively on "x86 >>> > supercomputer"? I think implementing multicore support would be a fir= st >>> > step, not to mention 64-bit! While it would be nice if those jobs were >>> done, >>> > they will take time and effort. Overall, if porting natively, I see >>> little >>> > sense in preferring Inferno to Plan 9, especially as Plan 9 already >>> supports >>> > 64-bit multicore. >>> > >>> >> Sadly, not. One issue is that modern Android releases don't >>> >> support 32-bit executables, and at the time that project was >>> >> attempted Inferno was somewhat 32-bit (I haven't looked since). >>> > >>> > Recalling the issues Hellaphone had and the time it took, I'm of the >>> opinion >>> > that getting Inferno to work on any given phone's Linux kernel is >>> hardly >>> > more worthwhile than porting it directly to the hardware. The kernels >>> have >>> > undocumented interfaces. >>> > >>> > A current thread on OSdev (operating system development) forums is >>> looking >>> > at phones. It's a little rambly, but it reports on some encouraging >>> things. >>> > Lots of "baseband processors" (the phone-network communication >>> subsystems) >>> > have documented interfaces. There are at least 2 phones available now >>> which >>> > are fully open for operating system development: the PinePhone and the >>> > Librem 5. (5 is the screen size.) Of the 2, the Pine Phone seems >>> better, not >>> > least because it can boot from the SD card; useful for testing. >>> > https://forum.osdev.org/viewtopic.php?f=3D1&t=3D53251 >>> > >>> > There's also the option of building your own phone out of components. >>> The >>> > thread has some info. I'm guessing most here would prefer a PinePhone. >>> > >>> >> But I think I saw some recent-ish Inferno-on-Android activity here: >>> >> >>> >> https://github.com/bhgv/Inferno-OS-bhgv >>> > >>> > That's probably a good source of code. bhgv is a freelance programmer >>> who >>> > was very interested in Inferno and made several improvements including >>> > Truetype fonts. The last I heard was he tried to find paid work >>> involving >>> > Inferno but couldn't, so he didn't have time to work on it. ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T39aec8f3f9d8503d-M080aa= d5bb3d8f05354a56fc5 Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription --00000000000011104705cc694ee2 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
i figured out the random hack which messe= d me up 12 years ago 2 days ago /c:f20
and the buda bug is fixed = on my system - took me 3 days strait to find it...
and the fusebl= k hack took a while /c:2021

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:39 AM Co= nor Williams <conor.williams= @gmail.com> wrote:
if it is a vfat filesystem it is ok....
=

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:37 AM Conor Williams <conor.williams@gmail.com> wr= ote:
some of the fuseblk disc/k drivers/modules on peppermint whic= h is a flavour of ubuntu
are not even in the kernel space and the= re are mount.XYZ processes left open which are
wide open to attac= k (with # fuser -p <PID>) /c09
for those chips tings
<= /div>

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:24 AM hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote:
i think the main reason peop= le are willing to fall for the android
platform is bec. there is no good long-term supply of updated phone
hardware with backwards-compatible interfaces.

a lot of qualcomm and mediatek chipsets are being built, but instead
of documentation they only ship half-baked linux drivers, which are
often not even mainlined.

those linux drivers are already hard to make work on actual linux
distributions, or even on android distributions.

who wants to reverse-engineer the hardware over and over again based
on such linux drivers...

On 9/20/21, Ethan Gardener <eekee57@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> tl;dr: forget inferno, port plan 9 to the pine phone.
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021, at 6:43 AM, Dave Eckhardt wrote:
>> > Anyone know if this project went anywhere?
>> >
>> > https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~412= /lectures/L05_Purge_Proposal.pdf
>
> I had to laugh at one of the slides. Inferno running natively on "= ;x86
> supercomputer"? I think implementing multicore support would be a= first
> step, not to mention 64-bit! While it would be nice if those jobs were= done,
> they will take time and effort. Overall, if porting natively, I see li= ttle
> sense in preferring Inferno to Plan 9, especially as Plan 9 already su= pports
> 64-bit multicore.
>
>> Sadly, not.  One issue is that modern Android releases don= 9;t
>> support 32-bit executables, and at the time that project was
>> attempted Inferno was somewhat 32-bit (I haven't looked since)= .
>
> Recalling the issues Hellaphone had and the time it took, I'm of t= he opinion
> that getting Inferno to work on any given phone's Linux kernel is = hardly
> more worthwhile than porting it directly to the hardware. The kernels = have
> undocumented interfaces.
>
> A current thread on OSdev (operating system development) forums is loo= king
> at phones. It's a little rambly, but it reports on some encouragin= g things.
> Lots of "baseband processors" (the phone-network communicati= on subsystems)
> have documented interfaces. There are at least 2 phones available now = which
> are fully open for operating system development: the PinePhone and the=
> Librem 5. (5 is the screen size.) Of the 2, the Pine Phone seems bette= r, not
> least because it can boot from the SD card; useful for testing.
> https://forum.osdev.org/viewtopic.php?= f=3D1&t=3D53251
>
> There's also the option of building your own phone out of componen= ts. The
> thread has some info. I'm guessing most here would prefer a PinePh= one.
>
>> But I think I saw some recent-ish Inferno-on-Android activity here= :
>>
>>   https://github.com/bhgv/Inferno-OS-bhgv<= /a>
>
> That's probably a good source of code. bhgv is a freelance program= mer who
> was very interested in Inferno and made several improvements including=
> Truetype fonts. The last I heard was he tried to find paid work involv= ing
> Inferno but couldn't, so he didn't have time to work on it.
------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink: https:= //9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T39aec8f3f9d8503d-M0f66e73ea984adbad982f7= 76
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/gro= ups/9fans/subscription
= --00000000000011104705cc694ee2--