From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4E1B0447-B6A7-4A8B-B038-583873956DD6@9srv.net> References: <4E1B0447-B6A7-4A8B-B038-583873956DD6@9srv.net> Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 14:32:23 +0000 Message-ID: From: Conor Williams To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134589617e90004ef25e552 Subject: Re: [9fans] ssh: non standard port Topicbox-Message-UUID: ad2b168a-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --001a1134589617e90004ef25e552 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 ok Anthony... will try that... is it ssh2.tbz? (in contrib?) On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Anthony Sorace wrote: > Conor wrote: > > > ...i'm trying to get this openssh (for V2) to use port 22... > > If you don't specifically need the openssh version for some > reason, I highly recommend the newer native ssh2 port. In > addition to neat features like the /net entry, it is more > robust and generally more consistent with the rest of the > Plan 9 environment. > Anthony > > > --001a1134589617e90004ef25e552 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
ok Anthony... will try that... is it ssh2.tbz? (in contrib= ?)


On Sa= t, Jan 4, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Anthony Sorace <a@9srv.net> wrote:
Conor wrote:

> ...i'm trying to get this openssh (for V2) to use port 22...

If you don't specifically need the openssh version for some
reason, I highly recommend the newer native ssh2 port. In
addition to neat features like the /net entry, it is more
robust and generally more consistent with the rest of the
Plan 9 environment.
Anthony



--001a1134589617e90004ef25e552--