From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 29249 invoked from network); 20 Sep 2021 08:39:53 -0000 Received: from tb-ob20.topicbox.com (173.228.157.66) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 20 Sep 2021 08:39:53 -0000 Received: from tb-mx0.topicbox.com (tb-mx0.nyi.icgroup.com [10.90.30.73]) by tb-ob20.topicbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8DD9265D8 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 04:39:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bounce.mM755e8f17a70fbc6e1c22d20f.r522be890-2105-11eb-b15e-8d699134e1fa@9fans.bounce.topicbox.com) Received: by tb-mx0.topicbox.com (Postfix, from userid 1132) id 9F93C4019157; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 04:39:51 -0400 (EDT) ARC-Authentication-Results: i=2; topicbox.com; arc=pass; dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=BaVqARys header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 x-bits=2048; dmarc=pass policy.published-domain-policy=none policy.published-subdomain-policy=quarantine policy.applied-disposition=none policy.evaluated-disposition=none (p=none,sp=quarantine,d=none,d.eval=none) policy.policy-from=p header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=conor.williams@gmail.com smtp.helo=mail-oi1-f173.google.com; x-internal-arc=fail (as.1.topicbox.com=pass, ams.1.topicbox.com=fail (body has been altered)) (Message modified while forwarding at Topicbox) ARC-Message-Signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= topicbox.com; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type:list-help:list-id:list-post :list-subscribe:reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :list-unsubscribe; s=sysmsg-1; t=1632127191; bh=qoGL/l710pwGphMZ aC7EHkEweBZgbUwq/832qwW2RQA=; b=WGgnqHauXpHfro73alyGausxPI8TUXxO JniB4IAhZZiP9cS2QFic+Dh9bxQnTfim8cpUI7ZffMfNUKQu62gbjrDeM47lDOvy 7LPj+Z/NDVKTFcK8hhaJjxLiwj9sqzQcUHoOf83enK66XQHzhXvR/HQmDhfyoGd/ wc3Jd5tKAxc= ARC-Seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; cv=pass; d=topicbox.com; s=sysmsg-1; t= 1632127191; b=TpMJkxtrqztcQmGqdYyuMyqSqjSX/7tZ9RVv01mMZx7njbtmOv MjKVRCA2VImb4f3LzZdirw9kgOH1g9jIcbNZ6QhMMRJLgmhintpdbPUwMXfhIDUO NFRyZoAKIVXdAo9+3m2NPR1Pv0DBfwOP1Vl6miqgA8pMQ/jDNCExZrkeU= Authentication-Results: topicbox.com; arc=pass; dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=BaVqARys header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 x-bits=2048; dmarc=pass policy.published-domain-policy=none policy.published-subdomain-policy=quarantine policy.applied-disposition=none policy.evaluated-disposition=none (p=none,sp=quarantine,d=none,d.eval=none) policy.policy-from=p header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=conor.williams@gmail.com smtp.helo=mail-oi1-f173.google.com; x-internal-arc=fail (as.1.topicbox.com=pass, ams.1.topicbox.com=fail (body has been altered)) (Message modified while forwarding at Topicbox) X-Received-Authentication-Results: tb-mx1.topicbox.com; arc=none (no signatures found); bimi=skipped (DMARC Policy is not at enforcement); dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=BaVqARys header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 x-bits=2048; dmarc=pass policy.published-domain-policy=none policy.published-subdomain-policy=quarantine policy.applied-disposition=none policy.evaluated-disposition=none (p=none,sp=quarantine,d=none,d.eval=none) policy.policy-from=p header.from=gmail.com; iprev=pass smtp.remote-ip=209.85.167.173 (mail-oi1-f173.google.com); spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=conor.williams@gmail.com smtp.helo=mail-oi1-f173.google.com; x-aligned-from=pass (Address match); x-google-dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key) header.d=1e100.net header.i=@1e100.net header.b=UGwA183w; x-me-sender=none; x-ptr=pass smtp.helo=mail-oi1-f173.google.com policy.ptr=mail-oi1-f173.google.com; x-return-mx=pass header.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-tls=pass smtp.version=TLSv1.2 smtp.cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 smtp.bits=256/256; x-vs=clean score=0 state=0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=9fans.net; h= mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject :to:content-type:list-help:list-id:list-post:list-subscribe :reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:list-unsubscribe; s=dkim-1; bh=8KLYAgCaPUqJ6Qdr4Q+6fP2ksnMdC5WRMw/Spj8thfU=; b=Yyz7LKid+D3a pWv0GIohofi16mG9WY4CEHAFELXvmBbEdwbZxb+FWt9wa7AKpY7FBmTH0sIRCHsk +nfjja5LiYU6NLS1j9YVJwVEKNWakHmALTf2Ne6nlQc3ogitr+Rx8zraCgqf/Yha 7XwumS/JtQztTY0Lb3zN2kIRu2wvEcI= Received: from tb-mx1.topicbox.com (localhost.local [127.0.0.1]) by tb-mx1.topicbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0B8416BA41 for <9fans@9fans.net>; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 04:39:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from conor.williams@gmail.com) Received: from tb-mx1.topicbox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tb-mx1.topicbox.com (Authentication Milter) with ESMTP id 95F9CD52891; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 04:39:41 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; d=topicbox.com; s=arcseal; t= 1632127181; b=tywCLWUFo9FN8RdFrBVFDgRFw2oihK+Ih/QQsK6O1jAjPGpmXt H22YZToNmblASIVNwAwdg8xcAN3AwnkkEPBhEHTddp2WSMI3l5OTQLvg4x9ICNEO exfjyjGXr47rmpsZjiG4RiMzng0XdBjKwG3mWvOrySBES3PoR8u2jfhnCuRQLG2M Wfp/lgnXtgbF2UOljYCashcey+jb7TzmYGz+aFIb1DFL5ktvrbmoQtH9l8gDF3qH sIzvMsiA+ikaKUV7bXPb3YAfbjMBj8dy3xeHaQeXWjkBM+IBRsdvkUJ4a82uBjvb MbIV067h4c/1enzSnUra1Ux6JqKqkj3NzB3g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= topicbox.com; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=arcseal; t=1632127181; bh=EkzgHp0c/jB1ySw6bQTOJBh2AEXKcddCI3EIGUXK3K4=; b=b1ZzANOTmWPq ENrYQAUgc6X1buc3SxtlGKPmmFbYPKf4+eaBO8n9JJN51BiKC+Dw1eg1lSy4yev6 rWSsJlL+FrQI83CdKpqDgfqOisoTQ9jkg6+Jo1AQ3h7J45Br10GRea5ZAfJi1p3i 6/76Wx3yuJwtl94xbMMdhWLzJKtW2DIKCqgmmlfQ2jHHUTEZOAPAPyppP7Um9gq1 Llu82XUUSgDTIUTRcN8gIOBj1W1HVQL6W8BPot+bKMHJa5BPMeiC/YMEoUwmCrTu OR5GNTjGvCtUWLM1LPo/otM7+RsKjK8ZId9pMEJMPgmGpvrgUw1A0j5CbdkQDhfQ 4V+O6E5etg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; tb-mx1.topicbox.com; arc=none (no signatures found); bimi=skipped (DMARC Policy is not at enforcement); dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=BaVqARys header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 x-bits=2048; dmarc=pass policy.published-domain-policy=none policy.published-subdomain-policy=quarantine policy.applied-disposition=none policy.evaluated-disposition=none (p=none,sp=quarantine,d=none,d.eval=none) policy.policy-from=p header.from=gmail.com; iprev=pass smtp.remote-ip=209.85.167.173 (mail-oi1-f173.google.com); spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=conor.williams@gmail.com smtp.helo=mail-oi1-f173.google.com; x-aligned-from=pass (Address match); x-google-dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key) header.d=1e100.net header.i=@1e100.net header.b=UGwA183w; x-me-sender=none; x-ptr=pass smtp.helo=mail-oi1-f173.google.com policy.ptr=mail-oi1-f173.google.com; x-return-mx=pass header.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-tls=pass smtp.version=TLSv1.2 smtp.cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 smtp.bits=256/256; x-vs=clean score=0 state=0 X-ME-VSCause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudeitddgudefleculddtuddrgeduhedrtd dtmdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggft fghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftd dtnecunecujfgurhepgghfjgfhfffkuffvtgesrgdtreertddtjeenucfhrhhomhepveho nhhorhcuhghilhhlihgrmhhsuceotghonhhorhdrfihilhhlihgrmhhssehgmhgrihhlrd gtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeukeefuedtfeeghfffteefvedvieeutedtffef hfdvffetveefgfegheefudetgfenucffohhmrghinheptghmuhdrvgguuhdpohhsuggvvh drohhrghdpghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmpdhtohhpihgtsghogidrtghomhenucfkphepvddt ledrkeehrdduieejrddujeefnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepudenucfrrghrrghmpe hinhgvthepvddtledrkeehrdduieejrddujeefpdhhvghlohepmhgrihhlqdhoihduqdhf udejfedrghhoohhglhgvrdgtohhmpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoegtohhnohhrrdifihhllh hirghmshesghhmrghilhdrtghomheq X-ME-VSScore: 0 X-ME-VSCategory: clean Received-SPF: pass (gmail.com ... _spf.google.com: Sender is authorized to use 'conor.williams@gmail.com' in 'mfrom' identity (mechanism 'include:_netblocks.google.com' matched)) receiver=tb-mx1.topicbox.com; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from="conor.williams@gmail.com"; helo=mail-oi1-f173.google.com; client-ip=209.85.167.173 Received: from mail-oi1-f173.google.com (mail-oi1-f173.google.com [209.85.167.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tb-mx1.topicbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <9fans@9fans.net>; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 04:39:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from conor.williams@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi1-f173.google.com with SMTP id y201so9046134oie.3 for <9fans@9fans.net>; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 01:39:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=EkzgHp0c/jB1ySw6bQTOJBh2AEXKcddCI3EIGUXK3K4=; b=UGwA183w5qiRS70B7SZCqL8FOLP5K/zzT5b8ibKAz1iHdE7XOhhNbNKGDAdQqCpGVE CU0IsjW+blbolXMF+9YVUbvJri/iq1xqp80iaopcuTF7MvnCGqiuYr0fbvPKMw6PpD3O z8TXlZJ8w53p3eEgjIAgKL7FRFMTQUMHLt6NrSmG3kF+eo4sHnt9zM4NS/9jL3FZogRn nGX8/8M1ySUfKvBHMPxdvdaU5Ix1VWv+C9cIouvVEvoJoaOcCa9dH36R3Xa4jSoc0lIF JRvBFeM2NQrYCjRBLM3o6+r1MaCl4n9fIwAQ4ZTbvAiDEJgE1KIdR2QtoZjiL91vHGhV nDkw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531FGPpGAVyWHyTU8SalIa7mxK2ro1eVbufTvyYrdJmcQqtmPUif qgqbFrpgFS5QijVqZ15ORiiCvj3s3duq+3X32B8MXt747foEdQLA X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx9WEYrbaowGwbXidUpCzfWZtFCfzwqGDPDSERmTsiaXJq11Qt7dtPcZrQlPzLn9xmCS4BgyeTqmExXHdQl+kA= X-Received: by 2002:a54:4688:: with SMTP id k8mr22041426oic.70.1632127180795; Mon, 20 Sep 2021 01:39:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <15937.1632116621@lunacy.ugrad.cs.cmu.edu> <565ccec9-0efb-45ad-9d08-dbfe6ed35bd5@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Conor Williams Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 08:39:28 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [9fans] GSoC 2021 project ideas To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d6f2c005cc693873" Topicbox-Policy-Reasoning: allow: sender is a member Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4f2eaf3c-19ee-11ec-bd23-d0dfc7caf9ce Archived-At: =?UTF-8?B?PGh0dHBzOi8vOWZhbnMudG9waWNib3guY29tL2dyb3Vwcy85?= =?UTF-8?B?ZmFucy9UMzlhZWM4ZjNmOWQ4NTAzZC1NNzU1ZThmMTdhNzBmYmM2ZTFjMjJk?= =?UTF-8?B?MjBmPg==?= List-Help: List-Id: "9fans" <9fans.9fans.net> List-Post: List-Software: Topicbox v0 List-Subscribe: Precedence: list Reply-To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Unsubscribe: , Topicbox-Delivery-ID: 2:9fans:437d30aa-c441-11e9-8a57-d036212d11b0:522be890-2105-11eb-b15e-8d699134e1fa:M755e8f17a70fbc6e1c22d20f:1:WMT_RmMQlJClV-cx1FvJgB7G9whGSevzzxalFCMjSp0 --000000000000d6f2c005cc693873 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable if it is a vfat filesystem it is ok.... On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:37 AM Conor Williams wrote: > some of the fuseblk disc/k drivers/modules on peppermint which is a > flavour of ubuntu > are not even in the kernel space and there are mount.XYZ processes left > open which are > wide open to attack (with # fuser -p ) /c09 > for those chips tings > > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:24 AM hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote: > >> i think the main reason people are willing to fall for the android >> platform is bec. there is no good long-term supply of updated phone >> hardware with backwards-compatible interfaces. >> >> a lot of qualcomm and mediatek chipsets are being built, but instead >> of documentation they only ship half-baked linux drivers, which are >> often not even mainlined. >> >> those linux drivers are already hard to make work on actual linux >> distributions, or even on android distributions. >> >> who wants to reverse-engineer the hardware over and over again based >> on such linux drivers... >> >> On 9/20/21, Ethan Gardener wrote: >> > tl;dr: forget inferno, port plan 9 to the pine phone. >> > >> > On Mon, Sep 20, 2021, at 6:43 AM, Dave Eckhardt wrote: >> >> > Anyone know if this project went anywhere? >> >> > >> >> > https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~412/lectures/L05_Purge_Proposal.pdf >> > >> > I had to laugh at one of the slides. Inferno running natively on "x86 >> > supercomputer"? I think implementing multicore support would be a first >> > step, not to mention 64-bit! While it would be nice if those jobs were >> done, >> > they will take time and effort. Overall, if porting natively, I see >> little >> > sense in preferring Inferno to Plan 9, especially as Plan 9 already >> supports >> > 64-bit multicore. >> > >> >> Sadly, not. One issue is that modern Android releases don't >> >> support 32-bit executables, and at the time that project was >> >> attempted Inferno was somewhat 32-bit (I haven't looked since). >> > >> > Recalling the issues Hellaphone had and the time it took, I'm of the >> opinion >> > that getting Inferno to work on any given phone's Linux kernel is hard= ly >> > more worthwhile than porting it directly to the hardware. The kernels >> have >> > undocumented interfaces. >> > >> > A current thread on OSdev (operating system development) forums is >> looking >> > at phones. It's a little rambly, but it reports on some encouraging >> things. >> > Lots of "baseband processors" (the phone-network communication >> subsystems) >> > have documented interfaces. There are at least 2 phones available now >> which >> > are fully open for operating system development: the PinePhone and the >> > Librem 5. (5 is the screen size.) Of the 2, the Pine Phone seems >> better, not >> > least because it can boot from the SD card; useful for testing. >> > https://forum.osdev.org/viewtopic.php?f=3D1&t=3D53251 >> > >> > There's also the option of building your own phone out of components. >> The >> > thread has some info. I'm guessing most here would prefer a PinePhone. >> > >> >> But I think I saw some recent-ish Inferno-on-Android activity here: >> >> >> >> https://github.com/bhgv/Inferno-OS-bhgv >> > >> > That's probably a good source of code. bhgv is a freelance programmer >> who >> > was very interested in Inferno and made several improvements including >> > Truetype fonts. The last I heard was he tried to find paid work >> involving >> > Inferno but couldn't, so he didn't have time to work on it. ------------------------------------------ 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T39aec8f3f9d8503d-M755e8= f17a70fbc6e1c22d20f Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription --000000000000d6f2c005cc693873 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
if it is a vfat filesystem it is ok....
=

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 8:37 AM Conor Williams <conor.williams@gmail.com> wrote:
some = of the fuseblk disc/k drivers/modules on peppermint which is a flavour of u= buntu
are not even in the kernel space and there are mount.XYZ pr= ocesses left open which are
wide open to attack (with # fuser -p = <PID>) /c09
for those chips tings

On Mon, Sep = 20, 2021 at 8:24 AM hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote:
i think the main reason people are willing to fal= l for the android
platform is bec. there is no good long-term supply of updated phone
hardware with backwards-compatible interfaces.

a lot of qualcomm and mediatek chipsets are being built, but instead
of documentation they only ship half-baked linux drivers, which are
often not even mainlined.

those linux drivers are already hard to make work on actual linux
distributions, or even on android distributions.

who wants to reverse-engineer the hardware over and over again based
on such linux drivers...

On 9/20/21, Ethan Gardener <eekee57@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> tl;dr: forget inferno, port plan 9 to the pine phone.
>
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2021, at 6:43 AM, Dave Eckhardt wrote:
>> > Anyone know if this project went anywhere?
>> >
>> > https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~412= /lectures/L05_Purge_Proposal.pdf
>
> I had to laugh at one of the slides. Inferno running natively on "= ;x86
> supercomputer"? I think implementing multicore support would be a= first
> step, not to mention 64-bit! While it would be nice if those jobs were= done,
> they will take time and effort. Overall, if porting natively, I see li= ttle
> sense in preferring Inferno to Plan 9, especially as Plan 9 already su= pports
> 64-bit multicore.
>
>> Sadly, not.  One issue is that modern Android releases don= 9;t
>> support 32-bit executables, and at the time that project was
>> attempted Inferno was somewhat 32-bit (I haven't looked since)= .
>
> Recalling the issues Hellaphone had and the time it took, I'm of t= he opinion
> that getting Inferno to work on any given phone's Linux kernel is = hardly
> more worthwhile than porting it directly to the hardware. The kernels = have
> undocumented interfaces.
>
> A current thread on OSdev (operating system development) forums is loo= king
> at phones. It's a little rambly, but it reports on some encouragin= g things.
> Lots of "baseband processors" (the phone-network communicati= on subsystems)
> have documented interfaces. There are at least 2 phones available now = which
> are fully open for operating system development: the PinePhone and the=
> Librem 5. (5 is the screen size.) Of the 2, the Pine Phone seems bette= r, not
> least because it can boot from the SD card; useful for testing.
> https://forum.osdev.org/viewtopic.php?= f=3D1&t=3D53251
>
> There's also the option of building your own phone out of componen= ts. The
> thread has some info. I'm guessing most here would prefer a PinePh= one.
>
>> But I think I saw some recent-ish Inferno-on-Android activity here= :
>>
>>   https://github.com/bhgv/Inferno-OS-bhgv<= /a>
>
> That's probably a good source of code. bhgv is a freelance program= mer who
> was very interested in Inferno and made several improvements including=
> Truetype fonts. The last I heard was he tried to find paid work involv= ing
> Inferno but couldn't, so he didn't have time to work on it.
------------------------------------------
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https:= //9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T39aec8f3f9d8503d-M0f66e73ea984adbad982f7= 76
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/gro= ups/9fans/subscription
= --000000000000d6f2c005cc693873--