9fans - fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tyga <cyberfonic@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Subject: Re: [9fans] what heavy negativity!
Date: Fri,  5 Oct 2018 19:06:44 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALj3Nd144eBCGjDtLLrdtzu_xyVud9g_+ELQymBYTcqDG+V2tA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181005050936.s6jfxqfxr3pymocp@v520.kathe.in>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1959 bytes --]

Hi Mayuresh !

Can't help offering the quote:

*First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
you win. *
*Mahatma Gandhi*

I have read with considerable bemusement the many responses to your
proposal.  Granted that it does look like a huge challenge.  Knowledgeable
people can see many problems with what you are contemplating.  But you have
to remember that you might learn a great deal if you attempt your idea and
sometimes good things come from attempting grand challenges. Just think
what would have happened if Columbus had given up when his proposal was
first rejected.

May I suggest that you overlook the emotional negativity and look at the
technical specifics of why many others see your proposal as foolhardy.
Then having given due consideration to the technical issues and your
resources (both time and knowledge) you would be in a far better position
to make an informed decision.

IMHO Plan9 offers a great deal of potential but is hamstrung by the lack of
resources to advance device drivers and accommodate the evolution of
hardware since the times it was designed.  To many people the visual
aspects of the user interface are unappealing and yet to others that is
exactly what appeals to them.  So it is impossible to please all the people
all the time.  I for one, would very much like to see the Plan9
architecture and thus concepts become available within more mainstream
environments.





On Fri, 5 Oct 2018 at 15:11, Mayuresh Kathe <mayuresh@kathe.in> wrote:

> man, i experienced such heavy negativity towards my efforts to build a
> linux kernel based plan9port vehicle that i am sure considering
> abandoning the effort.
>
> the idea was to have a 64-bit linux kernel with the advantages of
> plan9port (small and elegantly designed+developed tools).
>
> no, really, there was too much negativity.
>
> sorry that i bothered you all.
>
> ~mayuresh
>
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3876 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-05  9:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-05  5:09 Mayuresh Kathe
2018-10-05  9:06 ` Tyga [this message]
2018-10-05  9:26   ` hiro
2018-10-05 13:21 ` Steven Stallion
2018-10-05 14:57 ` Kurt H Maier
2018-10-05 15:36   ` Devon H. O'Dell
     [not found] <1195217680.4861494.1538749250231.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
2018-10-05 14:20 ` Brian L. Stuart
2018-10-08  2:45   ` Digby R.S. Tarvin
2018-10-08  3:55     ` Lucio De Re
2018-10-08  7:17       ` hiro
2018-10-08  9:44     ` Richard Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALj3Nd144eBCGjDtLLrdtzu_xyVud9g_+ELQymBYTcqDG+V2tA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=cyberfonic@gmail.com \
    --cc=9fans@9fans.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).