From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:35:46 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Peter A. Cejchan" To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f9a4c2e1f01004a7ccef04 Subject: Re: [9fans] interesting(?) widgets idea Topicbox-Message-UUID: feaee90c-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --001485f9a4c2e1f01004a7ccef04 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 ah, page, yes!! if only we could have editable menus (i mean something like an acme tagline) ... there's a strange ambiguity: acme-style, or rio-style.... On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:21 PM, hiro <23hiro@googlemail.com> wrote: > You know page, right? > acme window borders are also not active. Instead we have that little > box at the top to change size. > I think it's ok for them to adapt plan9 ideas. But I always hated the > feel of stuff popping up somewhere at random. it is not random... it is like a different cursor appears when you place it at the corner of the active window > I'd rather buy more > pixels. > > for my >100MB photographs (acquired via scanner, of course) i just can't buy more pixels, at least in my lifetime :-( thanks, ++pac --001485f9a4c2e1f01004a7ccef04 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ah, page, yes!! if only we could have editable menus (i mean something like= an acme tagline) ... there's a strange ambiguity: acme-style, or rio-s= tyle....

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:21 PM,= hiro <23hiro= @googlemail.com> wrote:
You know page, right?
acme window borders are also not active. Instead we have that little
box at the top to change size.
I think it's ok for them to adapt plan9 ideas. But I always hated the feel of stuff popping up somewhere at random.
it is not r= andom... it is like a different cursor appears when you place it at the cor= ner of the active window

=C2=A0
I'd rather buy more
pixels.

for my >100MB photographs (acquired via scanner, of c= ourse) i just can't buy more pixels, at least in my lifetime :-(
thanks,
++pac

--001485f9a4c2e1f01004a7ccef04--