From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:25:29 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Peter A. Cejchan" To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517740b121a4c9a04a7cccb9a Subject: Re: [9fans] interesting(?) widgets idea Topicbox-Message-UUID: fea73fea-ead6-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --001517740b121a4c9a04a7cccb9a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable please, be more verbous... i personally like everything that saves my pixels dedicated to anotherb job= , but i may be wrong, and it is only IMHO, as usually... i spent much time also by thinking how to get rid of acme's tag lines (i love acme so much, indeed) however, i was not able to conceive anything but a command frame [=3D=3Dwin= dow] inside of Acme... if only were i skilled enough to write it, and test it... i am not :-( Thanks for your opinion, anyway, best, ++pac On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 5:14 PM, simon softnet wrote= : > I don't like it, but it's just my humble opinion :) > > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Peter A. Cejchan wrot= e: > >> hi, folks, >> >> please, look at this: >> http://www2.gli.cas.cz/home/cejchan/plan9/ubuntu_widgets.png, and share >> your opinion; >> the main thing is the right-hand side with the slider >> and let's talk about this screen-pixels-saving idea >> the window borders are thin, but still active, mainly from outside of th= e >> window >> scrollbars are thin, too, with a "pop-out" slider tool >> could be improved, of course >> however, not a bad idea, IMHO >> I always wanted to get rid of all that pixel-consuming stuff... >> another way would, perhaps, be using keyboard for vert/hor scrolling, bu= t >> I feel that there's a strong opposition to using kb for anything else th= an >> character input... >> >> best regards, >> ++pac >> > > --=20 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D Petr A. Cejchan =E4=BD=A9=E6=81=9D =E5=9D=A0=E6=99=83 Office: cej@gli.cas.cz Home: tyapca7@gmail.com Web: http://home.gli.cas.cz/cej/www/ http://www.facebook.com/cejchan Work: +420-233 087 237 Home/SMS: not yet (thanks God) ICQ: 583000501 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D --001517740b121a4c9a04a7cccb9a Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable please, be more verbous...
i personally like everything that saves my pi= xels dedicated to anotherb job,
but i may be wrong, and it is only IMHO,= as usually...
i spent much time also by thinking how to get rid of acme= 's tag lines
(i love acme so much, indeed)
however, i was not able to conceive anythi= ng but a command frame [=3D=3Dwindow] inside of Acme... if only were i skil= led enough to write it, and test it... i am not :-(
Thanks for your opin= ion, anyway,
best,

++pac


On Mon, Jul 11, 20= 11 at 5:14 PM, simon softnet <ph.softnet@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't like it, but it's just my humble opinion :)
=


On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 a= t 4:56 PM, Peter A. Cejchan <tyapca7@gmail.com> wrote:
hi, folks,

please, look at this:=C2= =A0 http://www2.gli.cas.cz/home/cejchan/plan9/ubuntu_widget= s.png, and share your opinion;
the main thing is the right-hand side with the slider
and let's talk about this screen-pixels-saving idea
the window borde= rs are thin, but still active, mainly from outside of the window
scrollb= ars are thin, too, with a "pop-out" slider tool
could be impro= ved, of course
however, not a bad idea, IMHO
I always wanted to get rid of all that pix= el-consuming stuff...
another way would, perhaps, be using keyboard for = vert/hor scrolling, but I feel that there's a strong opposition to usin= g kb for anything else than character input...

best regards,
++pac




--
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Petr A. Cejchan
=E4=BD=A9=E6=81=9D =E5=9D=A0= =E6=99=83

--001517740b121a4c9a04a7cccb9a--