Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions)

["Peter A. Cejchan" <tyapca7@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1463 bytes --]

"clive was just another attempt"...oh, no... Clive is dead ???

On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Francisco J Ballesteros <nemo@lsub.org>
wrote:

> I don’t now if clive or not,
>
> but, I think the world has changed and I’d like to get a plan9 like
> environment
> but considering as the HW all the machines I use, including their OS as
> the new “HW”.
>
> I’ve been trying to do that since the octopus, clive was just another
> attempt; ideas are welcome :-)
>
>
> > On 5 May 2017, at 21:43, Giacomo Tesio <giacomo@tesio.it> wrote:
> >
> > You might find https://lsub.org/ls/clive.html interesting.
> >
> >
> > Giacomo
> >
> > 2017-05-05 15:25 GMT+02:00 Dave MacFarlane <driusan@gmail.com>:
> >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber <sl@stanleylieber.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go.
> >>>
> >>> sl
> >>>
> >>
> >> I started trying to do that at one point, but never got my kernel much
> >> farther than booting just enough to run "Hello, world!" compiled with
> >> 6c on a FAT filesystem in ring 0 and then crashing the system before
> >> deciding I don't have the time to finish it or get it somewhere
> >> useable. If anyone who has the time is interested in picking it up,
> >> contact me off-list and I'll send you a link to my (horribly written
> >> and designed) code.
> >>
> >> I'm more of a userspace kinda guy anyways..
> >>
> >> - Dave
> >
>
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2260 bytes --]