From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9EE5FC4E-DBA4-44F0-879B-05BB45413F56@lsub.org> References: <9EE5FC4E-DBA4-44F0-879B-05BB45413F56@lsub.org> From: "Peter A. Cejchan" Date: Sat, 6 May 2017 15:12:34 +0200 Message-ID: To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113e22de6b6b3d054edac269 Subject: Re: [9fans] Reimplementing Plan 9 in Go (Was: Re: [9front] bio io functions) Topicbox-Message-UUID: bc0eac06-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --001a113e22de6b6b3d054edac269 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable "clive was just another attempt"...oh, no... Clive is dead ??? On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Francisco J Ballesteros wrote: > I don=E2=80=99t now if clive or not, > > but, I think the world has changed and I=E2=80=99d like to get a plan9 li= ke > environment > but considering as the HW all the machines I use, including their OS as > the new =E2=80=9CHW=E2=80=9D. > > I=E2=80=99ve been trying to do that since the octopus, clive was just ano= ther > attempt; ideas are welcome :-) > > > > On 5 May 2017, at 21:43, Giacomo Tesio wrote: > > > > You might find https://lsub.org/ls/clive.html interesting. > > > > > > Giacomo > > > > 2017-05-05 15:25 GMT+02:00 Dave MacFarlane : > >> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber > wrote: > >>> > >>> Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go. > >>> > >>> sl > >>> > >> > >> I started trying to do that at one point, but never got my kernel much > >> farther than booting just enough to run "Hello, world!" compiled with > >> 6c on a FAT filesystem in ring 0 and then crashing the system before > >> deciding I don't have the time to finish it or get it somewhere > >> useable. If anyone who has the time is interested in picking it up, > >> contact me off-list and I'll send you a link to my (horribly written > >> and designed) code. > >> > >> I'm more of a userspace kinda guy anyways.. > >> > >> - Dave > > > > > --001a113e22de6b6b3d054edac269 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
"clive was just another attempt"...oh, no... Cli= ve is dead ???

On Sat, May 6, 2017 at 10:18 AM, Francisco J Ballesteros <nemo@lsub.o= rg> wrote:
I don=E2=80=99t = now if clive or not,

but, I think the world has changed and I=E2=80=99d like to get a plan9 like= environment
but considering as the HW all the machines I use, including their OS as the= new =E2=80=9CHW=E2=80=9D.

I=E2=80=99ve been trying to do that since the octopus, clive was just anoth= er attempt; ideas are welcome :-)


> On 5 May 2017, at 21:43, Giacomo Tesio <giacomo@tesio.it> wrote:
>
> You might find https://lsub.org/ls/clive.html interesting. >
>
> Giacomo
>
> 2017-05-05 15:25 GMT+02:00 Dave MacFarlane <driusan@gmail.com>:
>> On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:21 AM, Stanley Lieber <sl@stanleylieber.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Plan 9 has not yet been re-implemented in Go.
>>>
>>> sl
>>>
>>
>> I started trying to do that at one point, but never got my kernel = much
>> farther than booting just enough to run "Hello, world!" = compiled with
>> 6c on a FAT filesystem in ring 0 and then crashing the system befo= re
>> deciding I don't have the time to finish it or get it somewher= e
>> useable. If anyone who has the time is interested in picking it up= ,
>> contact me off-list and I'll send you a link to my (horribly w= ritten
>> and designed) code.
>>
>> I'm more of a userspace kinda guy anyways..
>>
>> - Dave
>



--001a113e22de6b6b3d054edac269--