From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 08:41:12 -0400 Message-ID: From: Joseph Stewart To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bea3dfc8d9343051a343887 Subject: Re: [9fans] two ethernet in a raspberry pi. Topicbox-Message-UUID: 5d55bfd8-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --047d7bea3dfc8d9343051a343887 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Also, I'm not sure if the SPI but would compound the max routing speed or not but I suspect it would. Even with these limitations, it would probably be good for the p9 community to have drivers for these kinds of devices. On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 4:30 AM, hiro <23hiro@gmail.com> wrote: > It only has "10Base-T"... > > On 7/4/15, michaelian ennis wrote: > > I wonder, aloud, if an spi connected ethernet interface might be an > > acceptable solution: > > > > https://www.sparkfun.com/products/765 > > > > ian > > > > --047d7bea3dfc8d9343051a343887 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Also, I'm not sure if the SPI but would compound = the max routing speed or not but I suspect it would.

Even with= these limitations, it would probably be good for the p9 community to have = drivers for these kinds of devices.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 4:30 AM, hiro <23hiro@g= mail.com> wrote:
It only = has "10Base-T"...

On 7/4/15, michaelian ennis <michaelian.ennis@gmail.com> wrote:
> I wonder, aloud, if an spi connected ethernet interface might be an > acceptable solution:
>
> https://www.sparkfun.com/products/765
>
> ian
>


--047d7bea3dfc8d9343051a343887--