On 9/1/18, Lucio De Re <lucio.dere@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Trying it out, it fails to find "attach" and there is no clue where
> that should come from. It did strike me as complex, but if it serves
> an NFS filesystem, that is probably adequate.
>
> I'll wait to pass judgement for after I have it actually serving
> anything at all.
>
I have made some progress, /tmp/9/ (the missing link, it seems) and
/mnt/ now look the same, so presumably something is going on. Maybe
the overengineering isn't too top-heavy, I need to check.

Lucio.