From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 00:50:46 -0400 Message-ID: From: s s To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf300fb2454c144804ac2a74a9 Subject: Re: [9fans] high precision timings Topicbox-Message-UUID: 198295d0-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --20cf300fb2454c144804ac2a74a9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 12:42 AM, ron minnich wrote: > The TSC has been badly abused by the chip makers over the last ten > years. It went through a period of time where it had poor accuracy. Be > sure to look at your hardware and make sure it's a later chip which > will give you reasonable TSC behavior. > > ron > Not concerned just yet about the accuracy of the hardware. Just wondering why the example client outputs "invalid arguments", and the server outputs ... 2011/09/05 00:37:14 bad client connection: [::1]:57429 Still happy to see something compile, run, and give output, though. - Leonard --20cf300fb2454c144804ac2a74a9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 12:42 AM, ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> wrote:
=
The TSC has been badly abused by the chip makers over the last ten
years. It went through a period of time where it had poor accuracy. Be
sure to look at your hardware and make sure it's a later chip which
will give you reasonable TSC behavior.

ron

Not concerned just yet about the accura= cy of the hardware.

Just wondering why the example client outputs &q= uot;invalid arguments", and the server outputs ...

2011/09/05 0= 0:37:14 bad client connection:=A0 [::1]:57429

Still happy to see something compile, run, and give output, though.
=
=A0- Leonard




--20cf300fb2454c144804ac2a74a9--