From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+yaQw9fP83NgTAjGALxxWcK8Rq0yUQJtn2XPOfw5a8_vHE3MQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABwHSOvGOaQQr5=86twzZ25OfkvDUFpkXZAa6AcN-cfHs1rkgw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOw7k5h+vCbtSic7eFRqi8H+9hMvnuw2WvGphCjZ3r7N_suy4g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+yaQw9fP83NgTAjGALxxWcK8Rq0yUQJtn2XPOfw5a8_vHE3MQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue,  4 Mar 2014 10:48:34 +0100
Message-ID: <CANUoZoE4JCRDxVhA1gYXUnsLQ5J4OyuoAmBoTNGZ-nNhyYH0qQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: David du Colombier <0intro@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] p9p on 64 bit Linux
Topicbox-Message-UUID: c3879656-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On a 64-bit Linux, I think you should rather compile plan9port in
64-bit. If you gcc doesn't produce 64-bit executables by default, try
to add -m64 in 9c and recompile plan9port.

--
David du Colombier