From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <59A40CDB-21A4-495B-B4D7-843DEACE0176@quintile.net>
References: <87C61423-7C13-4516-88B5-C2ABA7D32AA9@me.com>
	<A1D8C0A6-BB79-42EB-9874-C3F4A8FCC1F6@9srv.net>
	<919294DB-2559-46FB-9800-DB0FBDB63AF6@me.com>
	<59A40CDB-21A4-495B-B4D7-843DEACE0176@quintile.net>
Date: Tue,  5 May 2015 17:54:08 +0200
Message-ID: <CANUoZoEHivWe6zB5CYB7SgrJGE4o3cF1_7my5gONL2Hqwd8tCQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: David du Colombier <0intro@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] fossil+venti performance question
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4f09940e-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> I too see this, and feel, no proof, that things used to be better. I.e. the first time I read a file from venti it it very, very slow. subsequent reads from the ram cache are quick.
>
> I think venti used to be faster a few years ago. maybe another effect of this is the boot time seems slower than it used to be.
>
> sorry to be vague.

I'm pretty sure this issue started something like two years ago.
It looks like a regression somewhere.

--
David du Colombier