From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOEdRO3Ns6bNydh1yyQTgiJ2Y_xJf+20ErOgCe6aX6Ko1rmH4A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOEdRO3Ns6bNydh1yyQTgiJ2Y_xJf+20ErOgCe6aX6Ko1rmH4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:14:42 +0100
Message-ID: <CANUoZoEMmP-wq14g3-bOGVpxo-zmq2sCbkfs0GeuLJCah+HRSA@mail.gmail.com>
From: David du Colombier <0intro@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] advice? fossil+venti (p9),
 vbackup+venti (p9p) vs. some other means of backup
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 361ac6b6-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> I guess there are also people using fossil+venti on
> p9. Are those happy?

I'm using Fossil and Venti on Plan 9 and I'm quite happy.

On my typical setup, I've two arenas partitions mirrored
on two hard disks using venti/mirrorarenas.

My main file server is mirrored to another file server
using venti/wrarena every night.

I'm regularly dumping arenas to backup hard disks
and blu-ray using venti/rdarena.

I don't really store any long-term stuff on my Linux
machines. I just copy the files to the Plan 9 file
servers using v9fs.

--
David du Colombier