From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAEAzY38Az=_4Min2vFfXCkNez-7Wka104QiWf=FaafmnJuAAWw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87C61423-7C13-4516-88B5-C2ABA7D32AA9@me.com>
	<A1D8C0A6-BB79-42EB-9874-C3F4A8FCC1F6@9srv.net>
	<CAEAzY38Az=_4Min2vFfXCkNez-7Wka104QiWf=FaafmnJuAAWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon,  4 May 2015 20:51:54 +0200
Message-ID: <CANUoZoERAwWAMxLYGiAGOihHBwPAq07XyKmiTyCg2tmgvaO44Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: David du Colombier <0intro@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] fossil+venti performance question
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4eeac290-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

I'm experiencing the same issue as well.

When I launch vacfs on the same machine as Venti,
reading is very slow. When I launch vacfs on another
Plan 9 or Unix machine, reading is fast.

I've just made some measurements when reading a file:

Vacfs running on the same machine as Venti: 151 KB/s
Vacfs running on another machine: 5131 KB/s

--
David du Colombier