From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 14:23:50 +0100 Message-ID: From: David du Colombier <0intro@gmail.com> To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [9fans] rc exec error behaviour Topicbox-Message-UUID: 81add5dc-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 > For 386, Go barely works. For amd64, current Go doesn't currently work > on 9front (but works on Charles' kernel), probably due to a kernel > bug. You got confused. It works (but there are still issues) on both 9front's and Charles' amd64 kernel, but not on 9front's 386 kernel (since November 2014). > Btw, Go broke on 9front about a year ago (or was it more than that?). > Only one single person noticed, and that was months later after the > fact. That serves as a useful test to gauge interest (and quality) in > Go on Plan 9. Another reason could be that most of 9front users use the amd64 kernel and not the 386 kernel. -- David du Colombier