From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c6337543c7b598cd5872f236d725fa3d@brasstown.quanstro.net>
References: <CAOw7k5jU-_PSttSOOmgEUrWnaYHnagchigqrfZrReobks6TiJA@mail.gmail.com>
	<c6a29f141ead4f91a54ab47ec4fcd1ce@proxima.alt.za>
	<20140507073809.62e1138e@zinc.9fans.fr>
	<c6337543c7b598cd5872f236d725fa3d@brasstown.quanstro.net>
Date: Wed,  7 May 2014 11:23:07 +0200
Message-ID: <CANUoZoF5jvkBMw-z-Zj1hkvocVFpovhKcau7gOe8zm2s=L+saw@mail.gmail.com>
From: David du Colombier <0intro@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] [GSOC] plan9 which arch code to use?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: e0609f8e-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> also why have atom.s in ape?

This is what was done on 386.

/n/sources/plan9/sys/src/ape/lib/ap/386/atom.s

--
David du Colombier