From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <431F6692-904D-4424-9036-C74FAB969B7C@lsub.org> From: David du Colombier <0intro@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 00:23:43 +0200 Message-ID: To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0c440ec72c6705552bc86d" Subject: Re: [9fans] double lock in proc.c Topicbox-Message-UUID: c094e0f6-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --94eb2c0c440ec72c6705552bc86d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" This was many years ago (when my now-white beard was still merely grey). Not worth going back to reconstruct the arguments, but I'll send Giacomo and Nemo a copy of my proc.c to examine for themselves. I'd also be interested by your copy if proc.c. Thanks. -- David du Colombier --94eb2c0c440ec72c6705552bc86d Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<= div>This was many years ago (when my now-white beard was still merely grey)= .=C2=A0 Not worth going back to reconstruct the arguments, but I'll sen= d Giacomo and Nemo a copy of my proc.c to examine for themselves.

I&= #39;d also be interested by your copy if proc.c.
Thanks.

--=C2=A0
David du Colombier
--94eb2c0c440ec72c6705552bc86d--