From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2752a1e7097e2952db22739df91b08ba@9.SQUiSH.org> References: <2752a1e7097e2952db22739df91b08ba@9.SQUiSH.org> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 18:58:57 +1000 Message-ID: From: Shane Morris To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b62498a448d5104feb051ba Subject: Re: [9fans] Compiler Message Topicbox-Message-UUID: 08306a76-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --047d7b62498a448d5104feb051ba Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 The older versions refused to run. I've not tried this version I downloaded today, only the "qemu-img" inside the package which worked fine. On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 6:55 PM, wrote: > > Q for Mac is horrible, dodgy software. Then again, I didn't build it from > > source. The good thing is, it'll convert images just fine. > > older versions probably. i built qemu-1.7.0 from source before > 2.0 was stable and have had no problems. i own fusion, but i > prefer qemu since fusion occupies kernel memory (meaning an > idle vm cannot be swapped out), and it uses about 30% more > memory per vm than qemu does. > > what problems did you have with it? > > > --047d7b62498a448d5104feb051ba Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The older versions refused to run. I've not tried this= version I downloaded today, only the "qemu-img" inside the packa= ge which worked fine.


On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 6:55 PM, <cam@9.squish.org> wrote:
> Q for Mac is horrible, dodgy software. Then again, I d= idn't build it from
> source. The good thing is, it'll convert images just fine.

older versions probably. =C2=A0i built qemu-1.7.0 from source before<= br> 2.0 was stable and have had no problems. =C2=A0i own fusion, but i
prefer qemu since fusion occupies kernel memory (meaning an
idle vm cannot be swapped out), and it uses about 30% more
memory per vm than qemu does.

what problems did you have with it?



--047d7b62498a448d5104feb051ba--