From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:25:37 +1100 Message-ID: From: Shane Morris To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1301019f12104f0d72536 Subject: [9fans] GreenArrays and Plan 9/ Inferno Topicbox-Message-UUID: b572a84e-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --001a11c1301019f12104f0d72536 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello 9fans, I saw reference to the GreenArrays chips on the list a while back, had a look, and was mighty impressed. Then I wondered, "Exactly what does Plan 9 or Inferno have to do with these chips, and how do they relate?" I considered you could have the 144CPU chip with mini-Styx processing routines, which would serve my needs well - I need to move in a whole heap of file data, process it in various ways, and move it out again, quickly, and the promise of 90 billion instructions per second really excited me. Obviously, these processors aren't floating point processors, and thats fine, I'm working with moving floating point sensor readings into and out of the "grid on a chip" and doing some basic functions on them, in a file based format. Its just the true potential that has me going "Wow, I can see this cloudy outline, but it still looks cool..." I admit, I may be barking right up the wrong tree here, and if I am, I will stand corrected. I'm just wondering of the potential of these chips, coupled with a fast FPGA and an PCI-e x1 link to an APU running Plan 9 as a "head node." I have a programmer who has always wanted to play with FPGAs as a technology, and I have several books on basic VHDL. But yeah, lets not put the cart in front of the horse now, right? Thanks everyone! --001a11c1301019f12104f0d72536 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello 9fans,

I saw reference to the Gre= enArrays chips on the list a while back, had a look, and was mighty impress= ed. Then I wondered, "Exactly what does Plan 9 or Inferno have to do w= ith these chips, and how do they relate?"

I considered you could have the 144CPU chip with mini-S= tyx processing routines, which would serve my needs well - I need to move i= n a whole heap of file data, process it in various ways, and move it out ag= ain, quickly, and the promise of 90 billion instructions per second really = excited me.

Obviously, these processors aren't floating point p= rocessors, and thats fine, I'm working with moving floating point senso= r readings into and out of the "grid on a chip" and doing some ba= sic functions on them, in a file based format. Its just the true potential = that has me going "Wow, I can see this cloudy outline, but it still lo= oks cool..."

I admit, I may be barking right up the wrong tree here,= and if I am, I will stand corrected. I'm just wondering of the potenti= al of these chips, coupled with a fast FPGA and an PCI-e x1 link to an APU = running Plan 9 as a "head node." I have a programmer who has alwa= ys wanted to play with FPGAs as a technology, and I have several books on b= asic VHDL. But yeah, lets not put the cart in front of the horse now, right= ?

Thanks everyone!
--001a11c1301019f12104f0d72536--