From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <47813B77-1111-4199-8C51-726B55B39BB0@gmail.com> References: <4C33D9D9-6A99-43E0-A621-0D137564F441@lsub.org> <10DB3CE7-1903-4D06-8784-1416398302CE@lsub.org> <47813B77-1111-4199-8C51-726B55B39BB0@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 23:53:06 +0530 Message-ID: From: Jiten Pathy To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [9fans] 9n Topicbox-Message-UUID: 6650ff0e-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 Thanks for clearing that up. I haven't looked at the code, but the changes in the paper looked interesting. On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Nemo wrote: > It's a modified stock kernel, no need to ask because I made the changes directly there. ;) > > Now seriously..., no plan 9 secret society has ever been actually secret and hiding code, > as far as I know, that is. The only times I saw someone was keeping code without publishing > it was because the code was not considered to be ready enough for others to try. > > Don't know if I should add more ":)"s, well... > > hth > > On Jun 17, 2013, at 6:29 PM, Jiten Pathy wrote: > >> I am just wondering, does the "new Plan9 secret society" approve of >> the release of code ? >> >> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 11:19 PM, Francisco J Ballesteros wrote: >>> >>> On Jun 6, 2013, at 7:40 PM, Francisco J Ballesteros wrote: >>> >>>> concat >>>> us >>> >>> Since concat'ing us may be disgusting, I should have written "contact us". >>> sorry. >>> >>> > >