From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <db83a632f1edae42784ced3ecee857c1@mikro.quanstro.net>
References: <53295712.1050505@gmail.com>
	<CAOCRf5VZUFj7RxAo8QeP+TwPxW8zyygEx1D8Wi42iUnPtUxWrQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANZw+5f1EkfiAMtTs9LrorLMqkGkVGercyy3H3YrCSQ_eypeVg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM6ozu5RWPv_SzUdynUjgPGOJ9D0tC8H=k08qof08nHdCJ74EQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEAzY39va+9K9+cGJZzra3TT2-LQL9A397YvcFya2zOwrttKaA@mail.gmail.com>
	<db83a632f1edae42784ced3ecee857c1@mikro.quanstro.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 16:00:25 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOCRf5VZhH23mZEOUHDvjDfmx79s=u_27OpzwnavCp6s4BXV7w@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?QmVuY2UgRsOhYmnDoW4=?= <begnoc@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] GSoC proposal: Alternative window system
Topicbox-Message-UUID: cbfd636a-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

I think Plan B / Octopus's omero does these things already. I'm still
voting for touch interface

2014-03-19 15:17 GMT+01:00, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net>:
> On Wed Mar 19 10:14:26 EDT 2014, aram.h@mgk.ro wrote:
>> What did old Oberon have?
>>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oberon_(operating_system)
>
> - erik
>
>