From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CALj3Nd3vW=qyqvU1oJcF7_S8+UeBe8y=uw2geu=raWFoScWj9Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOEdRO36CL2GtEVoLiXxEtvkqRA9eXiWNusCoC3qMG6ApU=AKQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANUoZoE-iEQJVSmkXJCcd0XtzU92Lh6LvHHdsLZifA2nvLfvcw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALj3Nd3vW=qyqvU1oJcF7_S8+UeBe8y=uw2geu=raWFoScWj9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 11:02:04 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOEdRO0CBemyNg+UoekEn2cmhsHYU+rodVpDi001vopr59B_Cg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rudolf Sykora <rudolf.sykora@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] questions about 9atom and 9legacy; and their updates
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 37297200-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 19 December 2014 at 04:11, da Tyga <cyberfonic@gmail.com> wrote:
> You could also consider 9vx especially if you are tempted to try running
> under Qemu or some other virtualised environment.
> Although I'm only at the exploratory stage, I find 9vx more useful than
> 9front.

Well, I'd really like to try p9 proper again, especially because I want it
to work as a file server with backup functionality (fossil+venti).
Thus I do not want it to be under any virtual machine or whatever...

I haven't ever use 9vx. In what sense you find it more useful than
9front?

Thanks
Ruda