From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ba51b53bc89d1beb6c6c68c0371dfcc4@ladd.quanstro.net>
References: <CAOEdRO1ZcGW7TnkBHhJ2+Gc3bgSViF13_1FRz3wON1aL8JG0yw@mail.gmail.com>
	<ba51b53bc89d1beb6c6c68c0371dfcc4@ladd.quanstro.net>
Date: Thu,  2 May 2013 17:48:03 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOEdRO1Z88zb9mqpmEus_3V0mTwCYEfB2sNK-gcJ3t+uF6mVng@mail.gmail.com>
From: Rudolf Sykora <rudolf.sykora@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] problem with a here document in rc
Topicbox-Message-UUID: 51087a1e-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

On 2 May 2013 17:24, erik quanstrom <quanstro@quanstro.net> wrote:
> i usually solve this problem like this
>
>         for(i in 1 2){
>                 mkdir -p $i || fatal
>                 cp POSCAR $i || fatal
>                 @{
>                         {
>                                 echo 2c
>                                 echo $i
>                                 echo .
>                                 echo w
>                                 echo q
>                         } | ed POSCAR
>                 }
>         }
>
> - erik


So you avoid a here document...
Then, is it so that a here document can't ever serve the purpose (ie.
it is limited in the way that any present variables are evaluated just
once; when then?)?

Thanks for a clarification!
Ruda