hello,

On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 11:21:21AM -0400, OrangeCalx01 wrote:
> A machine implementing a virtual machine implementing a virtual machine? Oh
> the latency! Lol. Why not integrate the jvm itself into dis?

I really don't know about virtual machines and maybe it's a stupid
question but i'm really currious about it and i really trust the plan9
expertise: why not port inferno on top of the jvm? is this a technical
nonsense? is there some performance/ressources issue or is it just an NIH
manifestation?

regards