Sorry, for misspelling(iOS trying to "help" me) Rpi and Brantley I meant. среда, 12 октября 2016 г. пользователь Sergey Zhilkin написал: > Hi ! > > Rip is good for running terminal. It do not have modern (and old :) ) > interfaces to storage. I'm use old big tower PC, with several hard drives. > I think Eric or Brantkey can tell more, as he still run Kfs. (Cwfs) > > среда, 12 октября 2016 г. пользователь Tyga написал: > >> Hi Jim, >> >> I think you should be fine. I'm using five rescued HP ePCs >> all >> with PIII @800MHz, 128MB RAM and a range of HDs, including one one with >> 80GB. All connected via a HP ProCurve 1G switch. I have one RPi2 >> connected to the cluster and it, too, works fine with them. Still having >> struggles with auth, etc. >> >> For what it's worth, I have an ePC booting off a compact flash card (via >> an IDE adaptor) - that one is rather slow. I haven't benchmarked this >> cluster against anything, but my impression is that it's Ok, but a single >> contemporary PC seems faster (SSD, SATA3, etc) >> >> Well that's one dodgy data point for you! >> >> >> On 12 October 2016 at 11:33, James A. Robinson >> wrote: >> >>> Folks, >>> >>> One of the things I'm thinking about is setting up a full Plan 9 >>> cluster, meaning one of the components would be a stand-alone >>> fileserver hooked up to a decent amount of storage. >>> >>> I was wondering what experience people have had with slower or faster >>> machines in this role? >>> >>> I was wondering whether or not it'd be feasible to hook up something >>> like http://tinyurl.com/jgov5gc (Amazon.com) to something small like a >>> Raspberry Pi 3, or if the I/O would be too much for that kind of >>> computer to handle. >>> >>> Does anyone here run a fileserver on a small computer like a >>> raspberry pi 3, or perhaps something like an Intel nuc? >>> >>> I wouldn't be supporting multiple users, just myself moving between >>> a couple of devices. >>> >>> Jim >>> >>> >> > > -- > Sent from Gmail Mobile > -- Sent from Gmail Mobile