From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: From: Sergey Zhilkin Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 13:31:58 +0300 Message-ID: To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b62536ae0784b0509b1f055 Subject: Re: [9fans] Chrome and 9 Topicbox-Message-UUID: 35c6649a-ead9-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --047d7b62536ae0784b0509b1f055 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I choose - "Waste of time" Too many hardware versions ( http://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/developer-information-for-chrome-os-dev= ices ) And, how about vendor-locks (Google :) )? 2014-12-08 2:59 GMT+03:00 da Tyga : > I think that Plan9Port using the underlying Linux OS might be a better > choice. I have also been thinking about cross-compiling from a Plan9 > install (such as that on Raspberry Pi) to Samsung ARM based ChromeBook. > > Getting Plan9 to work with fastboot and implementing device drivers for > the various ChromeBooks might be a lot of work. Don't know enough to > justify my assumptions though. > > On 8 December 2014 at 06:35, Roswell Grey wrote: > >> It's no question that the Chromebook makes a wonderful candidate to >> integrate features of 9 into. The thing was practically BUILT for >> distributed computing, what with app servers and cloud integration tight= ly >> integrated into the hardware. What I was thinking was creating a chrome >> extension for 9P and the distributed file system, so that there'd be an >> easy way to connect 9 machines and maybe even create a chrome 9 grid for >> super processing. What would be your opinion on doing such a thing? >> Practical? Waste of time? Wanna help? >> > > --=20 =D0=A1 =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=B8=D0=BB=D1=83=D1=87=D1=88=D0=B8=D0=BC=D0=B8 =D0=BF= =D0=BE=D0=B6=D0=B5=D0=BB=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B8=D1=8F=D0=BC=D0=B8 =D0=96=D0=B8=D0=BB=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=BD =D0=A1=D0=B5=D1=80=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=B9 With best regards Zhilkin Sergey --047d7b62536ae0784b0509b1f055 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I choose - "Waste of t= ime"

<= span style=3D"font-size:13px">Too many hardware versions (http://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/developer-information-for-chrome= -os-devices)=C2=A0
And, how about vendor-locks (Google :) )?<= /div>

2014-1= 2-08 2:59 GMT+03:00 da Tyga <cyberfonic@gmail.com>:
I think that Plan9Port using = the underlying Linux OS might be a better choice.=C2=A0 I have also been th= inking about cross-compiling from a Plan9 install (such as that on Raspberr= y Pi) to Samsung ARM based ChromeBook. =C2=A0

Getting Pl= an9 to work with fastboot and implementing device drivers for the various C= hromeBooks might be a lot of work.=C2=A0 Don't know enough to justify m= y assumptions though.

On 8 December 2014 = at 06:35, Roswell Grey <orangecalx01@gmail.com> wrote:<= br>

It's no question that = the Chromebook makes a wonderful candidate to integrate features of 9 into.= The thing was practically BUILT for distributed computing, what with app s= ervers and cloud integration tightly integrated into the hardware. What I w= as thinking was creating a chrome extension for 9P and the distributed file= system, so that there'd be an easy way to connect 9 machines and maybe= even create a chrome 9 grid for super processing. What would be your opini= on on doing such a thing? Practical? Waste of time? Wanna help?





--
=
=D0=A1 =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=B8=D0=BB=D1=83=D1=87= =D1=88=D0=B8=D0=BC=D0=B8 =D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=B6=D0=B5=D0=BB=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=B8= =D1=8F=D0=BC=D0=B8
=D0=96=D0=B8=D0=BB=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=BD =D0=A1=D0=B5=D1= =80=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=B9
With best regards
Zhilkin Sergey
--047d7b62536ae0784b0509b1f055--