From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <64e57b5cc889082953a7f022f534b833@quintile.net> <20130503162039.GA557@polynum.com> <510fc921748adc6e0cd271e0c60d56cb@9srv.net> <20130503164804.GA649@polynum.com> From: pmarin Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 19:24:18 +0200 Message-ID: To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6d9a88287b5804dbd3a06d Subject: Re: [9fans] anyone attempted to build ghostscript recently? Topicbox-Message-UUID: 54c96492-ead8-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --047d7b6d9a88287b5804dbd3a06d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 What about mupdf? It has few dependecies [1] http://mupdf.com/doc/ [1] http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=mupdf.git;a=tree;f=thirdparty;hb=HEAD pmarin. On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 7:16 PM, erik quanstrom wrote: > On Fri May 3 13:15:41 EDT 2013, knapjack@gmail.com wrote: > > > Is a PS/PDF library something that might benefit from reconstruction in > Go? > > Or is it just a spaghetti mess? > > go or c, a fresh implementation might be an improvement, > and given the weight of some of the other options, might be > more time-efficient than one would think. > > - erik > > --047d7b6d9a88287b5804dbd3a06d Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
pmarin.


On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 7:16 PM, erik quanstrom = <quanstro@qua= nstro.net> wrote:
On Fri May =C2=A03 13:15:4= 1 EDT 2013, knapjack@gmail.com wr= ote:

> Is a PS/PDF library something that might benefit from reconstruction i= n Go?
> Or is it just a spaghetti mess?

go or c, a fresh implementation might be an improvement,
and given the weight of some of the other options, might be
more time-efficient than one would think.

- erik


--047d7b6d9a88287b5804dbd3a06d--