From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from tb-mx1.topicbox.com (localhost.local [127.0.0.1]) by tb-mx1.topicbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9FF147E189B for <9fans@9fans.net>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 08:16:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from newton688@gmail.com) Received: from tb-mx1.topicbox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tb-mx1.topicbox.com (Authentication Milter) with ESMTP id 393743FDEA1; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 08:16:16 -0400 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; d=topicbox.com; s=arcseal; t= 1585052176; b=ec1PBABb8M4wT6M0hcZVc53RLfPrON+sxWEZudpkM1Afef93cL CN1lTkFY4H89jTF942Sx6Olye7xkb2WVJ8ZrLVunLyolArI0aq1SYk8EAN09joQV JUovmMnoj0utHXoxHsi8P8bYpKvb0BAdDVCC92yF7UI9I57w1JjAdWATXqVQQjrm 4xsnSx0YZiQElzBnUFNAxTMZ+rZa9QlRsKyiqJh2XYvsDvh+3tNW1eGMk+mAbg6M g1Juebv98xSFBYaww8MdHREPyfbzGJBOyXc9hJzFu47HEiVKdHnY5sQEpKdYCloT MdCyi9ecQR3qzN7yXgHVKd+nOldzwShYwlPQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= topicbox.com; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; s=arcseal; t=1585052176; bh=VQ3UNlQU/A5TrgGpOLdLjeXtzyJ6veXlEJCZFclYQLk=; b=ktyrjSZtNYwV tlaZ/U/W5vJ3CBp1GN2c4DxhUKbvKVu/yJPUbK0y+Gj4p8JoEYTIDKcMYPJfPUwP KV+5+hPdqk88dwD3CcwoVSzpqvaxxLX6kE3Mr1w02UXBZNXQ3qC/hyVKefrmB+/w luGF4KKa1Y/71tjvV+UNGp39ZVTa7LddRty81FEp6kQJUmAd1iPSz1NRO586KWmF IbkLI7sQdohrwIq/2o4cL/WUJlxpGtIZNpXpT4JzXA2CcxhjawaQzdrKOzVigm2F O+sOIP18abW2k4SvqjJUhZ8hWZQiB+5JmhyMdTVjZsaUsNWIy/PCM0NhgIuwm8Eg VnBI4zMJLw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; tb-mx1.topicbox.com; arc=none (no signatures found); bimi=none (Domain is not BIMI enabled); dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=Q9MLUE7C header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 x-bits=2048; dmarc=pass policy.published-domain-policy=none policy.published-subdomain-policy=quarantine policy.applied-disposition=none policy.evaluated-disposition=none (p=none,sp=quarantine,d=none,d.eval=none) policy.policy-from=p header.from=gmail.com; iprev=pass smtp.remote-ip=209.85.222.49 (mail-ua1-f49.google.com); spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=newton688@gmail.com smtp.helo=mail-ua1-f49.google.com; x-aligned-from=pass (Address match); x-google-dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key) header.d=1e100.net header.i=@1e100.net header.b=ehfgwV9e; x-ptr=pass smtp.helo=mail-ua1-f49.google.com policy.ptr=mail-ua1-f49.google.com; x-return-mx=pass header.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-tls=pass smtp.version=TLSv1.2 smtp.cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 smtp.bits=256/256; x-vs=clean score=0 state=0 Authentication-Results: tb-mx1.topicbox.com; arc=none (no signatures found); bimi=none (Domain is not BIMI enabled); dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key sha256) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=Q9MLUE7C header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20161025 x-bits=2048; dmarc=pass policy.published-domain-policy=none policy.published-subdomain-policy=quarantine policy.applied-disposition=none policy.evaluated-disposition=none (p=none,sp=quarantine,d=none,d.eval=none) policy.policy-from=p header.from=gmail.com; iprev=pass smtp.remote-ip=209.85.222.49 (mail-ua1-f49.google.com); spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=newton688@gmail.com smtp.helo=mail-ua1-f49.google.com; x-aligned-from=pass (Address match); x-google-dkim=pass (2048-bit rsa key) header.d=1e100.net header.i=@1e100.net header.b=ehfgwV9e; x-ptr=pass smtp.helo=mail-ua1-f49.google.com policy.ptr=mail-ua1-f49.google.com; x-return-mx=pass header.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-return-mx=pass smtp.domain=gmail.com policy.is_org=yes (MX Records found: alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com); x-tls=pass smtp.version=TLSv1.2 smtp.cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 smtp.bits=256/256; x-vs=clean score=0 state=0 X-ME-VSCause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrudehuddgtdekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeggfhgjhf ffkffuvfgtsegrtderredttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeevhhhrihhsucfotgfivggvuceonhgv fihtohhnieekkeesghhmrghilhdrtghomheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpehrrghsphgsvghrrh ihphhirdhorhhgpdhivggvvgdrohhrghdplehprdhiohdpthhophhitggsohigrdgtohhm necukfhppedvtdelrdekhedrvddvvddrgeelnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenuc frrghrrghmpehinhgvthepvddtledrkeehrddvvddvrdegledphhgvlhhopehmrghilhdq uhgruddqfhegledrghhoohhglhgvrdgtohhmpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoehnvgifthhonh eikeeksehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmqecuuffkkgfgpeekledvvd X-ME-VSScore: 0 X-ME-VSCategory: clean Received-SPF: pass (gmail.com ... _spf.google.com: Sender is authorized to use 'newton688@gmail.com' in 'mfrom' identity (mechanism 'include:_netblocks.google.com' matched)) receiver=tb-mx1.topicbox.com; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from="newton688@gmail.com"; helo=mail-ua1-f49.google.com; client-ip=209.85.222.49 Received: from mail-ua1-f49.google.com (mail-ua1-f49.google.com [209.85.222.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tb-mx1.topicbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS for <9fans@9fans.net>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 08:16:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from newton688@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ua1-f49.google.com with SMTP id r47so6166877uad.11 for <9fans@9fans.net>; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 05:16:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=VQ3UNlQU/A5TrgGpOLdLjeXtzyJ6veXlEJCZFclYQLk=; b=Q9MLUE7CAYjjvVfP+CEmAe7myFn2rnJGWvysojr/kjcZIZ0Y/7VcIUnglOVKN2c+nw nKnzuuw2qWOcttSMPQ3Oc5KkhhVS1dscF9ZT+X3GNl8YHb7AhZje2m6nzzQVUC2EXnmu XBKnoJ/Q+Nr8ocr5P2jHaoh8N5iKN9HlZL6t1o78rVXMytp1o2iPCkhAsyfbN8S8WwIS mEuAqCGfMg0GOK2xcybTApp1LvpMgP7fhXfLAvbhYsRkpvrFJ7Mss4YetI6yEJKGE8fn Rf2r90hu+zKnRIzMK6PhjgWRzwyQXEfJ4pRLGNAFbzzSt5D4RyqXHF1YXyeKpoTZdOe1 0vFg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=VQ3UNlQU/A5TrgGpOLdLjeXtzyJ6veXlEJCZFclYQLk=; b=ehfgwV9eoOS2lX2YsH16vFs49f+M5B2tShzaRKZgucfZLrWIgWDg7oeHndSDjpNL0h h9BBATT/6coTfsUGENW71P0P24J03iEoBSfzaq3DYtr60gUs3TxiAtxbusTwBIbZ4Cco jr+FUBmTICQeGxplMbSZtsNXqFqnz59noHPJmpVCKO81Q/5Vyw25iMYEQZARabCs2Thl YFr75Y5pBw/3kfwhaG4z8qOfr7Era3dfQG8EaGJdufLpLHlxA2/AoTIEiSR5WQiXOopO yf259MaZW+szIpMuDn52IOPWFwm6wDkBNqAFSBizrjrCCvaHw22WyVl6xi3W4Xk6EDpn gdpw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3LkL8UFEZeYi1z4uY0Vtwqy4UenSjrNsDU6wbAnzLd8ydQ6RJb LH+zz75sHVyDrFueVmJyEv2xJwqsNJZ3iORLKuOkpQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvq4NbEQVtEnk4fobq7pBHeE4nllIADjlv7ypHhCpCkVgE+Rj7J9tdGovDWWgGc9CCqImQm5CcvKaYiCvGMRZI= X-Received: by 2002:a9f:3381:: with SMTP id p1mr5897012uab.119.1585052174810; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 05:16:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <15849909490.7E5BEBB6.71072@composer.9fans.topicbox.com> In-Reply-To: From: Chris McGee Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 08:16:03 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [9fans] PoE Support for Plan9 on RPI 4B/3B+? To: 9fans <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d4827605a198b7f5" Topicbox-Policy-Reasoning: allow: sender is a member Topicbox-Message-UUID: 4601b1fc-6dc9-11ea-a186-a61ca9dd0f47 --000000000000d4827605a198b7f5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" I can vouch for the fact that the Pi 1,2 and 3 work fine with a simple 12W 10/100 PoE network/power splitter. They work fine with 9front as it is mostly transparent to the OS as far as I can tell. Chris On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 5:23 PM Skip Tavakkolian wrote: > The PoE hat shouldn't need any software support. I don't have one, but > it's basically a DC-DC converter. The Pi PoE hat has an Attiny processor > for temperature sensing/fan operation. > > You can also use a PoE splitter (48V->5V/2.4A micro USB) which would work > for all Pi's. > > -Skip > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 12:16 PM wrote: > >> I have four Raspberry Pi model 4B boards and a Raspberry Pi model 3B+ >> board and would like to know whether or not Power over Ethernet (PoE) is >> supported by the Pi9 port. >> >> Has anyone attempted to power a Plan9 cluster/grid over PoE? What PoE >> network switches would you recommend? Were there any issues? Richard >> Miller? >> >> To be clear, a PoE network enables boards to be powered over an Ethernet >> network if a side-board (HAT) is connected. [1] A PoE network switch >> conforming to IEEE 802.3af delivers power through the each Pi's RJ45 >> network connector over Cat 5 cabling. [2] >> >> To my knowledge, neither the 9front kernel sources nor the documented >> list of supported hardware, specifically mentions PoE. [3] It seems the >> network switch and HAT negotiate power delivery independently of the >> kernel so I cannot think of a reason why Plan9 would not support >> powering this way. >> >> References >> [1]: >> https://www.raspberrypi.org/blog/introducing-power-over-ethernet-poe-hat/ >> [2]: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1213877 >> [3]: https://9p.io/wiki/plan9/Supported_PC_hardware/index.html >> >> -- >> Barry Wasdell (bwasd) >> > *9fans * / 9fans / see discussions > + participants > + delivery options > Permalink > > --000000000000d4827605a198b7f5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I can vouch for the fact that the Pi 1,2 and 3 work f= ine with a simple 12W 10/100 PoE network/power splitter. They work fine wit= h 9front as it is mostly transparent to the OS as far as I can tell.
<= div>
Chris

On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 5:23 PM Skip Tavakkol= ian <skip.tavakkolian@gmai= l.com> wrote:
The PoE hat shouldn't need any software support. = I don't have one, but it's basically a DC-DC converter. The Pi PoE = hat has an Attiny processor for temperature sensing/fan operation.

=
You can also use a PoE splitter (48V->5V/2.4A micro USB) whic= h would work for all Pi's.

-Skip

On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 12:16 PM <barrywasdell@gmail.com> wrote:
I hav= e four Raspberry Pi model 4B boards and a Raspberry Pi model 3B+
<= div>board and would like to know whether or not Power over Ethernet (PoE) i= s
supported by the Pi9 port.

Has= anyone attempted to power a Plan9 cluster/grid over PoE? What PoE
network switches would you recommend? Were there any issues? Richard<= br>
Miller?

To be clear, a PoE netwo= rk enables boards to be powered over an Ethernet
network if a= side-board (HAT) is connected. [1] A PoE network switch
conf= orming to IEEE 802.3af delivers power through the each Pi's RJ45
network connector over Cat 5 cabling. [2]

<= div>To my knowledge, neither the 9front kernel sources nor the documented
list of supported hardware, specifically mentions PoE. [3] It = seems the
network switch and HAT negotiate power delivery ind= ependently of the
kernel so I cannot think of a reason why Pl= an9 would not support
powering this way.
9fans / 9fans / see discu= ssions + participants + delivery options Permalink
--000000000000d4827605a198b7f5--