From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAEoi9W5LCMup6zECW0CcEXAQxj643dYknKJxHFgqfDr_9ZB0+w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20120828141332.GA10058@intma.in>
	<6af219d70f9551dee8d013e5c34a255f@proxima.alt.za>
	<20120828150521.GA10731@intma.in>
	<CAEoi9W4oDxR=Kit52OsNJRG4UVgLB3q9tgsRNbQ2QE2zmxRzyA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120828153036.GA11005@intma.in>
	<CAEoi9W4b1B-v2tWWKEkdVaMWuOnwEXciMvaSL4o2t5uUR3THsA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120828174334.GA12589@intma.in>
	<CAEoi9W5vJCRCa9X-mTOa_hNWHXam3PO=Wf117Yo8TnTGdHrFDw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20120828182606.GA13190@intma.in>
	<CAEoi9W5LCMup6zECW0CcEXAQxj643dYknKJxHFgqfDr_9ZB0+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 13:42:57 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOr72mgEjNd4oaLb5EMxF1J391hyvD3hmzydjXwvd8iJJ3Wk0g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jeremy Jackins <jeremyjackins@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] rc vs sh
Topicbox-Message-UUID: b1f450ce-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

> Well, if you could explain a) how it's currently broken, and b) how a
> 'corrected' version would be useful, others might be more sympathetic
> to your concerns.  From most perspectives, it doesn't appear broken at
> all; it works fine, it's just not what you would have done.

Speak for yourself, please.