From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAE9W7-gZsWHuspmwBw0qU_djkiDhAF6hA2zLU3Ms=xiO1j5LXQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <19f6168fb6b109424ddbb1d276d62e6b@brasstown.quanstro.net>
	<CAE9W7-gZsWHuspmwBw0qU_djkiDhAF6hA2zLU3Ms=xiO1j5LXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun,  1 Jul 2012 21:39:11 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOw7k5g+tj=DkX23sZj+Z=g4HkAi72+1PJn3dkxyg_x9wJdm=w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175cff2678787804c3caace9
Subject: Re: [9fans] cc nit?
Topicbox-Message-UUID: a0a3f75c-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

--0015175cff2678787804c3caace9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

instead of trying to make void work as a data type declaration, it might be
clearer to accept an empty struct.

--0015175cff2678787804c3caace9
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

instead of trying to make void work as a data type declaration, it might be clearer to accept an empty struct.

--0015175cff2678787804c3caace9--