From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2dc159076288ada480674c4e00a70055@hamnavoe.com>
References: <CAOw7k5jcm=LXJCWBRVw6WsgoOQiUYHbm30PoYMw0kQPemePj_w@mail.gmail.com>
	<2dc159076288ada480674c4e00a70055@hamnavoe.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 22:56:48 +0000
Message-ID: <CAOw7k5g3LhKTswVFVY-HLB4MRUi1iOSBmLigGzSFVnhjHNtOsw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Charles Forsyth <charles.forsyth@gmail.com>
To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [9fans] 5l
Topicbox-Message-UUID: f62ada1a-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025

the diagnostic says that free is being taken from libc, so it will
have libc's version.
normally free is defined in port.

On 12 December 2012 22:53, Richard Miller <9fans@hamnavoe.com> wrote:
> You may be trying to link a kernel with some function like lock() coming
> from libc instead of its own version.