From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <19f6168fb6b109424ddbb1d276d62e6b@brasstown.quanstro.net> Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 08:42:34 +0100 Message-ID: From: Charles Forsyth To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175def8af5162104c3d3f09f Subject: Re: [9fans] cc nit? Topicbox-Message-UUID: a0edf802-ead7-11e9-9d60-3106f5b1d025 --0015175def8af5162104c3d3f09f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 You're right. I'd misread the assembly code. On 2 July 2012 01:18, Comeau At9Fans wrote: > Actually gcc gives it (the empty struct) sizeof zero (same as for its zero > length arrays). --0015175def8af5162104c3d3f09f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 You're right. I'd misread the assembly code.

On 2 July 2012 01:18, Comeau At9Fans <comeauat9fans@gmail.com> wrote:
Actually gcc gives it (the empty struct) sizeof zero (same as for its zero length arrays).

--0015175def8af5162104c3d3f09f--